Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado
Hello togehther, when I produce postscript output, in ghostview the output looks good, but when I want to convert it to tif in Photoshop, the font always looks bad, because its to light. Is it because postscript does not produce opaque colours ? When I change the font to bold font, nothing changes, too. Thanks for your help in advance ! Klemens
Klemens Barfus wrote: > Hello togehther, > > when I produce postscript output, in ghostview the output looks good, > but when I want to convert it to tif in Photoshop, the font always looks > bad, because its to light. Is it because postscript does not produce > opaque colours ? When I change the font to bold font, nothing changes, too. > > Thanks for your help in advance ! > > Klemens > We are using pstoimg from the latex2html package. I have not seen what you are describing. May be it depends on photoshop. Reimar -- Reimar Bauer Institut fuer Stratosphaerische Chemie (ICG-I) Forschungszentrum Juelich email: R.Bauer@fz-juelich.de ------------------------------------------------------------ ------- a IDL library at ForschungsZentrum Juelich http://www.fz-juelich.de/icg/icg-i/idl_icglib/idl_lib_intro. html ============================================================ =======
In article <c3a9bi$25ho97$1@uni-berlin.de>, Klemens Barfus <klemens.barfus@forst.tu-dresden.de> wrote: > Hello togehther, > > when I produce postscript output, in ghostview the output looks good, > but when I want to convert it to tif in Photoshop, the font always looks > bad, because its to light. Is it because postscript does not produce > opaque colours ? When I change the font to bold font, nothing changes, too. > > Thanks for your help in advance ! > > Klemens > What font are you using? I always set !p.font=0 when I use the postscript device in IDL and get good looking fonts. --Mike -- Michael Chinander m-chinander@uchicago.edu Department of Radiology University of Chicago