comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive - RDF feed
type: channel
description: Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado
items: Is System Dependent Compilation Possible?
items: Re: Is System Dependent Compilation Possible?

Is System Dependent Compilation Possible?
type: item
description: I have a tool written in IDL/Fortran and C that needs to run on both Unix and VMS systems. I have a few system dependent IDL procedures that I use as wrappers for the CALL_EXTERNALS. What I would like to do is have a batch file, say compile.pro, which can be invoked with @compile.pro and will compile the correct version of wrappers depending upon the OS, e.g. IF !version.os EQ 'vms' then begin .run vms_version.pro ENDIF ELSE BEGIN .run unix_version.pro ENDELSE Unfortunately, I can't seem to come up with anything that even approaches this. IF !version.os EQ 'vms' then .run vms_version.pro produces an error. Anybody got any ideas? Thanks Tim
creator: Tim Patterson
date: 1996-04-24T07:00:00-00:00

Re: Is System Dependent Compilation Possible?
type: item
description: > Making the branch in the IDL code itself would work > for a small number of routines. Unfortunately I > have to have wrappers for around 50+ Fortran routines > and it becomes very tedious editing every routine > in that manner :) I'm not going to guarantee that this will work, but on Unix, you may be able to use cpp (the C preprocessor) or m4 to preprocess your batch files that build the executable. You would have to do your builds on Unix though. I have never done this myself, but have seen cpp used for purposes other than preprocessing C code. I hope this helps. Ken Knighton kknighton@qualcomm.com knighton@cts.com San Diego CA ^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Note new address P.S. - I have changed employers and will be doing non-idl related stuff such as C++/embedded systems on the job. I will still be lurking though. What can I say, they gave me an offer I couldn't refuse. $-)
creator: Ken Knighton
date: 1996-04-26T07:00:00-00:00

Re: Is System Dependent Compilation Possible?
type: item
description: Tim Patterson <tim@raptor.lpl.arizona.edu> wrote: > > I have a tool written in IDL/Fortran and C that needs to > run on both Unix and VMS systems. I have a few system > dependent IDL procedures that I use as wrappers for the > CALL_EXTERNALS. > > What I would like to do is have a batch file, say > compile.pro, which can be invoked with @compile.pro > and will compile the correct version of wrappers > depending upon the OS, > > Unfortunately, I can't seem to come up with anything > that even approaches this. > > IF !version.os EQ 'vms' then .run vms_version.pro > > produces an error. > I have always wanted to use the .run executive command within procedures. Seems strange that you can't. I tried using the @routine.pro syntax but had problems. You might find a work-around for this, but I would suggest putting the system-dependent code inside your wrapper functions, since that's more consistent with the purpose of using a wrapper function in the first place. Or you might have a "master" wrapper function that calls other "sub-" wrapper functions according to the value of !VERSION.OS . The second approach would have the same effect as your previous attempt ... only the sub-wrapper that gets called would be compiled. Dave Foster foster@bial1.ucsd.edu
creator: David Foster
date: 1996-04-29T07:00:00-00:00