comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive - RDF feed
type: channel
description: Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado
items: Re: Cumulative total

Re: Cumulative total
type: item
description: In article <3602B1F3.210@cdc.noaa.gov>, Andrew Loughe <afl@cdc.noaa.gov> wrote: > Nice, elegant solution, Eddie. >> here is the way i do it: >> >> IDL> A = findgen(10) >> IDL> N = n_elements(A) >> IDL> result = A # (lindgen(N,N) ge transpose(lindgen(N,N))) >> IDL> print,result >> 0.00000 >> 1.00000 >> 3.00000 >> 6.00000 >> 10.0000 >> 15.0000 >> 21.0000 >> 28.0000 >> 36.0000 >> 45.0000 In my opinion this is a baroque construction that reveals a shortcoming in IDL. (Hey, not a major shortcoming. I'm not committing heresy here!) To compute the cumulative sum of a vector of length N, i.e., x_cum[0] = x[0] FOR i = 1, N-1 DO x_cum[i] = x_cum[i-1] + x[i] should require N loads, N flops (adds), and N stores. This may not optimize well, since each result depends on the previous one, but I suspect most modern Fortran or C compilers would do pretty well. The IDL approach above requires creating an N^2 matrix filled with integers, performing an if test on every element of that array and its transpose, and then performing a matrix-vector multiply (N^2 multiplies and N^2 adds). What do you do when N = 100,000? It seem a silly way to do a simple task. I'm not trying to pick on Eddie. It works for him. I wonder which method is faster? Maybe I should write a Fortran function to do it ... yuck -- highly non-portable. So, note to RSI: Add CUMULATIVE function to next release of IDL and make it a good IDL function so that one can specify which dimension of a possibly multidimensional array to accumulate over, etc. It should be quite useful with HISTOGRAM. Ken -- Kenneth P. Bowman, Professor 409-862-4060 Department of Meteorology 409-862-4466 fax Texas A&M University bowmanATcsrp.tamu.edu College Station, TX 77843-3150 Change the AT to @
creator: bowman
date: 1998-09-18T07:00:00-00:00

Re: Cumulative total
type: item
description: Nice, elegant solution, Eddie. P.S. Weren't you the kid on... Nah! eddie haskell wrote: > >> Can anyone suggest a more efficient way to compute the >> running cumulative total of a 1-D array than using FOR loops? > > here is the way i do it: > > IDL> A = findgen(10) > IDL> N = n_elements(A) > IDL> result = A # (lindgen(N,N) ge transpose(lindgen(N,N))) > IDL> print,result > 0.00000 > 1.00000 > 3.00000 > 6.00000 > 10.0000 > 15.0000 > 21.0000 > 28.0000 > 36.0000 > 45.0000 > > cheers, > eddie
creator: Andy Loughe
date: 1998-09-18T07:00:00-00:00

Re: Cumulative total
type: item
description: > Can anyone suggest a more efficient way to compute the running cumulative > total of a 1-D array than using FOR loops? here is the way i do it: IDL> A = findgen(10) IDL> N = n_elements(A) IDL> result = A # (lindgen(N,N) ge transpose(lindgen(N,N))) IDL> print,result 0.00000 1.00000 3.00000 6.00000 10.0000 15.0000 21.0000 28.0000 36.0000 45.0000 cheers, eddie __^__ __^__ ( ___ )----------------------------------------------------------- -( ___ ) | / | A. G. Edward Haskell | \ | | / | Center for Coastal Physical Oceanography | \ | | / | Old Dominion University, Norfolk VA 23529 | \ | | / | Voice 757.683.4816 Fax 757.683.5550 | \ | |___| e-mail haskell*ccpo.odu.edu |___| (_____)----------------------------------------------------- -------(_____)
creator: eddie haskell
date: 1998-09-18T07:00:00-00:00