comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL LICENSING MADNESS
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL LICENSING MADNESS [message #1106] Fri, 06 August 1993 10:01 Go to previous message
dpf is currently offline  dpf
Messages: 2
Registered: March 1992
Junior Member
jones@phobos.cira.colostate.edu (Andy Jones) writes:

>> I don't think this is true. The binary executable would have to be different,
>> but I think that the *licenses* can float between machines of different
>> architectures--even between VMS and Unix. This is what I've heard, but I don't
>> have any actual experience with it.

> Good point. Does anyone have any experience with mixed workstation environments
> and licenses out there? I'd be interested to find out.

Yes, floating network licenses *can* be used across different
architectures. We have three floating licenses that are used across several
Suns, two RS/6000s and an SGI. If you take a look at the idl executable
itself, you will see that it is actually a shell script that figures out
what architecture you are on, and then starts the correct binary.

Thus, our IDL directory has a generic bin directory, as well as bin.ibm,
bin.sgi, and bin.sunos.4.1.sun4 (all as named by RSI, not us). In our
case, all of this is on a "/usr1" partition that is NFS-mounted from a
server to all appropriate machines (even across architecture boundaries).

In addition to these floating licenses, we also have a node-locked license.
The advantage of this setup, we figured, is that users can access IDL
_from their local workstation_, and are only forced to go to the server (and
setenv DISPLAY, etc) when the three licenses are in use by others. And
since the server license is not limited, as many users as the server can
support can use it.

We have had the one fixed license for many years, but it sounds like our
current setup is much like what RSI is suggesting to John Kemp. There are,
of course, other ways to do it, but it works for us.

Hope this helps.

David

+----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------+
|David Friedlander / Hughes STX / Code 664 dpf@egret.gsfc.nasa.gov |
|Energetic Gamma Ray Experiment Telescope |
|Compton Gamma Ray Observatory |
|NASA/ Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD 20771 (301) 286-1129 |
+----------------------------------------------------------- ----------------+
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Problems with filled contours?
Next Topic: Re: GMT generated netCDF grid files and IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 14:35:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.23971 seconds