| why not us ? [message #11171] |
Thu, 26 February 1998 00:00 |
kyoung
Messages: 1
Registered: February 1998
|
Junior Member |
|
|
I hate to be one of those types that always says "but Matlab can
do that..." but this one I couldn't resist (sorry David; at
least I didn't do it in your class). Check out:
http://www.supercomp.org/sc97/program/TECH/MENON/INDEX.HTM
We in the IDL ghetto can only read it and weep (didn't RSI
say that they would provide parallel capabilities, or even just
threads, when hell froze over) It shouldn't be too long before
people running MultiMatlab on Beowulf machines makes all of us
IDL programmers mucho obsolete...
-- KY
--
------------------------------------------------------------ -------
Karl Young Phone: (415) 750-2158 lab
|
|
|
|
| Re: why not us ? [message #11178 is a reply to message #11171] |
Wed, 25 February 1998 00:00  |
davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Karl Young (kyoung@itsa.ucsf.edu) writes:
> I hate to be one of those types that always says "but Matlab can
> do that..." but this one I couldn't resist (sorry David; at
> least I didn't do it in your class). Check out:
>
> http://www.supercomp.org/sc97/program/TECH/MENON/INDEX.HTM
Oh, no. And I just signed up to write an Image Processing
with IDL book to take on the MatLab folks! If they can do
image processing on 10 processors all at once, maybe they
*will* be faster than IDL. :-)
Cheers,
David
-----------------------------------------------------------
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Phone: 970-221-0438
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
