comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl*

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl*

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* [message #11701 is a reply to message #11699]

Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00

Joe[2]
Messages: 11
Registered: May 1998

Junior Member

> Somebody whose message I've just lost proposed to moderate comp.lang.idl,
> and somebody else reacted saying that one won't even reach the more than
100
> yes votes necessary to do it, because comp.lang.idl is virtually dead and
has
> less than 100 readers (I do not know whether it's true) and proposed to
close
> it.
>
> If you close it, could one rename the ever-confusing comp.lang.idl-pvwave
to
> comp.lang.idl ? I believe the majority of (RSI) IDL users, which are more
> than 100, would find that easy.

The problem is that IDL has a slightly more common translation to
Interface Definition Language and comp.lang.idl is taken by those
folks. We could always start a group under the alt... hierarchy, but
I doubt there is neither the need nor motivation to moderate or
close this group down.

JMZ

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* By: dlhopols on Thu, 07 May 1998 00:00
		Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* By: Joe[2] on Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00
		Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* By: bowler on Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00
		Re: about moderation and comp.lang.idl* By: roberson on Wed, 06 May 1998 00:00

Previous Topic:	Workstation or X-Terminal ?
Next Topic:	idl under Windows NT behaviour

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 06:16:12 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.46992 seconds