| Re: odd behavior of loadct [message #11999 is a reply to message #11996] |
Fri, 19 June 1998 00:00   |
gurman
Messages: 82 Registered: August 1992
|
Member |
|
|
In article <35867171.499@rosa.mpin-koeln.mpg.de>, Alex Schuster
<alex@rosa.mpin-koeln.mpg.de> wrote:
> David Fanning wrote:
>
>> Alex Schuster (alex@rosa.mpin-koeln.mpg.de) writes:
>>
>>> David Fanning was WRONG:
>
> Oops... mabe I forgot a smiley here :)
>
>>>> on my web page for details. Use your Display control
>>>> panel to get your Mac in 256 color mode and you will have
>>>> no trouble.
>>>
>>> But: Having only 256 colors _is_ trouble!
>>
>> Wrong!? If my theory was right (and remember I couldn't
>> test it) and the IDL demo actually put John's Mac in 256
>> color mode and left it there. _And John couldn't tell the
>> difference_. Then where is the trouble? :-)
>
> The trouble is the missing 16776960 colors :-)
> Really, I want my workstation to display as much colors as I want. Okay,
> about 32000 colors would be enough for me, but 256 just is too few.
>
> And I would be surprised if IDL somehow could change the color depth on
> the Mac. However, I just tried what John wrote, and even running the
> demo first didn't help. Strange...
>
The other day, I installed 5.1 on my home Power Center Pro running OS
8.1, and a funny thing happened (at least, something that didn't happen
under 5.0.3): a routine
that calls LOADCT and then CW_ANIMATE produced only grey-scale movies
until I set the graphics... option under the Edit -> Preferences menu item
to "Pseudo (8-bit)."
I can still get any 256 colors I want, but why this change?
Joe Gurman
--
Joseph B. Gurman / NASA Goddard Space Flight Center/ Solar Data
Analysis Center / Code 682 / Greenbelt MD 20771 USA / Federal
employees are still prohibited from holding opinions while at work.
Any opinions expressed herein must therefore be someone else's.
|
|
|
|