comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » a=a(*,*,[4,1,2,3,0]) efficiency
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: a=a(*,*,[4,1,2,3,0]) efficiency [message #12353 is a reply to message #12314] Fri, 17 July 1998 00:00 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
davis is currently offline  davis
Messages: 15
Registered: March 1995
Junior Member
On 15 Jul 1998 01:30:30 +0200, David Kastrup <dak@mailhost.neuroinformatik.ruhr-uni-bochum.de>
wrote:
> temporary in the first place. How about
>
> a = (temporary(a))[*,*,[4,1,2,3,0]]

I have no knowledge of the internals of IDL, but I do not think that
the use of `temporary' will help. I am guessing that `temporary'
simply does the following:

1. Push value of `a' onto the stack. This results in the
reference count to array attached to `a' being increased by 1.

2. Free `a' and undefine the variable. This has the effect of
decrementing the reference count of array attached to `a' by 1.

The net result is that the ownership of the array attached to `a' will
have changed from `a' to the stack. Now consider:

a = a[*,*,[4,1,2,3,0]]

This will probably do the following:

1. Push value of `a' onto stack. Reference count of array
increased by 1.

2. Retrieve array from stack.

3. Create a new array that is a copy of the array on the stack
but with elements interchanged. Push result onto stack with
a reference count of 1.

4. Free array popped from stack. This reduces the reference
count of array attached to `a' by 1.

5. Assign the value of array on stack to `a'. First free the
array attached to `a', reducing the reference count by 1.

6. Then remove the new array from the stack and assign it to
`a'. The reference count of this array is still 1.

In both cases, at some instant, the original array and its
``interchanged'' copy will both exist. All `temporary' does is move
step 5 to between steps 1 and 2.

I imagine that `temporary' is really only useful in more complex
expressions, e.g., consider

a = (a + b) + c

which consists of 3 arrays `a', `b', and `c'. During the evaluation
of the RHS of this statement, 2 extra arrays will be created: (a+b)
and the result (a+b)+c. Thus at some point, 5 arrays will exist.
Just prior to the assignment to `a', the temporary arrat (a+b) will be
freed. Now consider:

a = (temporary(a) + b) + c

After the evaluation of (temporary(a)+b), only 3 arrays will exist:
(a+b), b, and c. Then when (a+b) is added to `c', another array will
be created raising the total number needed to 4.

Again, this is pure speculation and I may be totally wrong. But I
cannot thing of another way to implement this.

--John
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: writing a structure with pointers
Next Topic: Re: Restrucuting array problem

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:32:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.75969 seconds