comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Request for comparisons of IDL and Matlab
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Request for comparisons of IDL and Matlab [message #12954 is a reply to message #12876] Tue, 22 September 1998 00:00 Go to previous message
Harvey Rarback is currently offline  Harvey Rarback
Messages: 24
Registered: September 1998
Junior Member
Last week I wrote in message <6tptdg$n5l$1@nntp.Stanford.EDU>...

> I have just started working at a laboratory with some expertise in Matlab and
> none in IDL or PV-WAVE. I have been an IDL user for a decade and am
> trying to decide whether I should make the effort to get the scientists and
> programmers to think about using IDL. I would especially appreciate any
> input from people who have used the latest versions of both programming
> environments.
>
> Some of the features we will need:
>
> - ability to run on OpenVMS Alpha, Windows NT, possibly Unix
> - easy to develop GUIs
> - a robust set of mathematical and image processing tools
> - good performance


I got two responses from people who had used both environments and were
clear that, although both languages could do what we need, Matlab was
easier to use and had more tools and better support.

Do any users of IDL feel otherwise?

--Harvey
----
Harvey Rarback phone: (650)926-3963
Stanford Linear Accelerator Ctr fax: (650)926-4100
PO Box 4349, M/S 69 home phone: (650)560-9111
Stanford, CA 94309-0210
rarback@ssrl.slac.stanford.edu

"We need more good people. We have enough smart people."
Dr. Laura Schlessinger
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Bug in ENVI_GET_STATISTICS ?
Next Topic: Source Code: A min/max compound widget

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 12:57:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.96084 seconds