comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: AltiVec Support
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: AltiVec Support [message #13078] Wed, 14 October 1998 00:00
lvhare is currently offline  lvhare
Messages: 2
Registered: October 1998
Junior Member
In article <702dnp$mu5@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, pford@bcm.tmc.edu (Patrick V.
Ford) wrote:

> I was wondering if RSI was planning support for AltiVec for the Motorola
> G4 series of PPC. If you know, please post it here.
>
> 'AltiVec technology adds a vector execution unit to address
> high-bandwidth data processing and algorithmic-intensive computations
> for both desktop and embedded applications.'
>
> Thanks

I suspect the answer is no. RSI has to gear things for the least common
denominator to keep their code base reasonable. If they were to provide
development towards AltiVec, they would also be obligated to develop for
MMX, MMX2 and a few dozen UNIX accelerators both native to the OS and as
3rd party additions.

I would prefer they put more effort into things like 64-bit processors,
multi-threading and multiple processors. Perhaps if we have a bake sale we
could send the proceeds to them and have our preferences accomodated.
Maybe it would be better to just send them the baked goods.

--
Mike Schienle Interactive Visuals
mgs@ivsoftware.com http://www.ivsoftware.com
Re: AltiVec Support [message #13079 is a reply to message #13078] Wed, 14 October 1998 00:00 Go to previous message
lvhare is currently offline  lvhare
Messages: 2
Registered: October 1998
Junior Member
In article <702dnp$mu5@gazette.bcm.tmc.edu>, pford@bcm.tmc.edu (Patrick V.
Ford) wrote:

> I was wondering if RSI was planning support for AltiVec for the Motorola
> G4 series of PPC. If you know, please post it here.
>
> 'AltiVec technology adds a vector execution unit to address
> high-bandwidth data processing and algorithmic-intensive computations
> for both desktop and embedded applications.'
>
> Thanks

I suspect the answer is no. RSI has to gear things for the least common
denominator to keep their code base reasonable. If they were to provide
development towards AltiVec, they would also be obligated to develop for
MMX, MMX2 and a few dozen UNIX accelerators both native to the OS and as
3rd party additions.

I would prefer they put more effort into things like 64-bit processors,
multi-threading and multiple processors. Perhaps if we have a bake sale we
could send the proceeds to them and have our preferences accomodated.
Maybe it would be better to just send them the baked goods.

--
Mike Schienle Interactive Visuals
mgs@ivsoftware.com http://www.ivsoftware.com
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: IDL library database
Next Topic: Re: 24-bit color postscript again

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 12:53:50 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.88066 seconds