comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews [message #13231]

Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00

Craig Hamilton
Messages: 28
Registered: December 1996

Junior Member

Matthew J. Sheats wrote in message <3639D5CB.9B59DCE3@lanl.gov>...
> However, I think the greatest addition is the new data types (for me at
>least). 16-bit unsigned integer, 32-bit unsigned long
>integer, 64-bit long integer, and 64-bit unsigned long integer.
>Invaluable to me anyway.

Those new datatypes are definitely useful - now I'm waiting
on a complex 16-bit signed integer datatype..... that is the datatype that
most (all?) MRI scanners use for their acquired data. Are there
folks other than MRI types that would find this useful?

Craig

-Craig A. Hamilton,PhD cah@medeng.wfubmc.edu
-Wake Forest Univ. School of Medicine
-Dept. of Med. Engr. / MRI Center
-Medical Center Blvd.
-Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1022
-(336)716-2819 [FAX: 2870] [Secr: 6890]

Report message to a moderator

Previous Topic:	Q: HDF and IDL? Annotations?
Next Topic:	Re: IDL 5.2 reviews?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Thu Oct 09 09:16:56 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.32087 seconds