comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?)

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?) [message #13259]

Thu, 29 October 1998 00:00

korpela
Messages: 59
Registered: September 1993

Member

In article <MPG.10a0dc4d233f00db9896e3@news.frii.com>,
David Fanning <davidf@dfanning.com> wrote:
>> does this mean they'll introduce a new TYPE value and shift
>> strings, structures, pointers, etc. one up? "Oh jemineh !" (german) that
>> would mean a lot of rewriting ...
>
> Nein. The new unsigned (16-bit) integer is type 12, followed
> by the 32-bit unsigned integer as type 13. Then the 64-bit
> integer at 14, with the new 64-bit unsigned integer as type 15.

It does mean a lot of "Unsupported data type" messages from my LINKIMAGEd
stuff once I start using the new types. I don't suppose we can convince them
to put an IDL_VERSION define in "external.h".

Eric

--
Eric Korpela | An object at rest can never be
korpela@ssl.berkeley.edu | stopped.
<a href="http://sag-www.ssl.berkeley.edu/~korpela">Click for home page.</a>

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?) By: korpela on Thu, 29 October 1998 00:00
		Re: unsigned int ? (was: 16 bit images?) By: davidf on Wed, 28 October 1998 00:00

Previous Topic:	plotting and large data files
Next Topic:	Re: multi-surfaces on shade_surf

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:28:17 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.37225 seconds