comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: 16 bit images?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: 16 bit images? [message #13273] Tue, 27 October 1998 00:00
davidf is currently offline  davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
Senior Member
Note: This is a copy of an article was posted to the IDL newsgroup.

Scott Norton (Scott_Norton@surromed.com) writes:

> I"m new to these discussions, but I had a question about IDL and
> PV-WAVE.
> Currently, I have a demo version of PV-WAVE and I seem to be running
> into
> the problem that many of the functions work only for 8bit images. I
> have a 16bit
> gray level image I would like to analyze. Is my cursory view wrong?

I suspect so. What do you mean by "many functions work
only for 8-bit images"? Which functions in particular?

> Does IDL work better with 16bit images?

I'm certain both IDL and PV-Wave work with 16-bit integers.
I think I would look elsewhere for the source of these
problems.

If these images are unsigned 16-bit values I can imagine
you might be having some problems. There are some tips on
my web page about how to handle that kind of data.
Fortunately, IDL 5.2 is suppose to have a new 16-bit unsigned
integer data type, so even these problems may be a thing
of the past soon.

Cheers,

David

----------------------------------------------------------
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Phone: 970-221-0438, Toll-Free Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: call_external for file I/O
Next Topic: Finding "objects" in images

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 08:55:32 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.63755 seconds