comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL 5.2 Reviews

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews [message #13326 is a reply to message #13234]

Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00

Craig Hamilton
Messages: 28
Registered: December 1996

Junior Member

You are right, Dave, so the few of us who are working with the
complex raw data from MRI scanners are probably out of luck.
(But I bet there are more of us than there are of the NASA
imaging folks.... how come they get what they want? ;) )
Craig

David Foster wrote in message <363A1801.1736@bial1.ucsd.edu>...

>> Those new datatypes are definitely useful - now I'm waiting
>> on a complex 16-bit signed integer datatype..... that is the datatype
that
>> most (all?) MRI scanners use for their acquired data. Are there
>> folks other than MRI types that would find this useful?
>> Craig -
>
> I believe that most people that use MRI images, like our group,
> are using the images after they have been reconstructed. At this
> point they are simple 16-bit signed integer images.
>
> Dave

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		IDL 5.2 Reviews By: Matthew J. Sheats on Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00
		Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews By: David Foster on Tue, 03 November 1998 00:00
		Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews By: Craig Hamilton on Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00
		Re: IDL 5.2 Reviews By: David Foster on Fri, 30 October 1998 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: Object Surface Shaded by Elevation (LONG)
Next Topic:	Re: clipboard objects and postscript (unix)

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:02:35 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.47958 seconds