| Re: XLOADCT does not do anything in IDL for Windows 95 [message #13661 is a reply to message #13655] |
Fri, 20 November 1998 00:00  |
davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Paul R. Harvey (harveypr@isracom.co.il) writes:
> I am evaluating IDL 5.1 for windows 95. I am very familiar with IDL 4.0 for
> the SGI unix platform. I see that XLOADCT does nothing in Windows 95. Why is
> this? and what is the alternative?
This is getting to be a bit redundant, isn't it? I have
a modest suggestion: Why not make Device, Decomposed=0
the default and let people who want true 24-bit color set
it by typing Device, Decomposed=1. Then people going to
24-bit color for the first time wouldn't be so darn
confused all the time. :-)
Try this:
IDL> Device, Decomposed=0
Your Windows machine is set up in 16-bit or 24-bit color.
You will want to learn a little about what that means to
you. Lot's of good information about colors in IDL on my
web page. :-)
Cheers,
David
P.S. An alternative to XLOADCT is XCOLORS from my
web page. It is just a little bit smarter than
XLOADCT (although I see that XLOADCT is catching
up a bit in the newest versions).
--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Progamming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Note: This follow-up was e-mailed to the cited author.]
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
