comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: FORMAT codes and tabs

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? [message #15352 is a reply to message #15346]

Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00

davidf
Messages: 2866
Registered: September 1996

Senior Member

Justin Ashmall (Justin_Ashmall@hotmail.com) writes:

> Thanks Robert, another good solution. I have to say, though, that I'm
> disappointed that IDL seems unable to handle something as simple as a
> tab-delimited file.

I think I've missed something. Who said IDL can't handle
a tab-delimited file? Tabs are treated as white space
the same as commas and spaces in reading free-format
input.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? By: Justin Ashmall on Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00
		Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? By: Mark Hadfield on Wed, 12 May 1999 00:00
		Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? By: davidf on Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00
		Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? By: Justin Ashmall on Tue, 11 May 1999 00:00
		Re: FORMAT codes and tabs - why not use STR_SEP? By: Robert King on Mon, 10 May 1999 00:00

Previous Topic:	AMD processor and IDL
Next Topic:	Re: coherence test implementation

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 17:50:48 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00263 seconds