comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » SVD in WAVE broken???
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
SVD in WAVE broken??? [message #1582] Fri, 10 December 1993 07:42 Go to next message
patel is currently offline  patel
Messages: 9
Registered: August 1992
Junior Member
Hello:

Yesterday I was talking to a friend of mine who has both WAVE and IDL
running on his machine. He claims that the SVD routine in WAVE runs
considerably slower than the SVD routine in IDL. He also told me that
for matrices of size 50000 X 20 the wave routine came back with error
message saying no space or something like that where as the IDL gets
him the results!! It was a surprise to me since I thought the core
routines in IDL and WAVE are the same. Anybody care to comment on
this?

-maqbool
Re: SVD [message #6778 is a reply to message #1582] Wed, 14 August 1996 00:00 Go to previous message
hto is currently offline  hto
Messages: 15
Registered: April 1996
Junior Member
Daisei Konno <dxk1280@rit.edu> wrote:

> Hello! I am looking for a SVD that gives a complete orthogonal matricies
> for a rectangular input matrix. For a (m x n) matrix, E, SVD SHOULD
> give
> U: (m x m)
> S: (m x n)
> V: (n x n)

> if E = U ## S ## TRANSPOSE(V)

> This is implemented in MATLAB; how come not in IDL? Thanks.

I believe that SVDC in version 4.0.1 implements the SVD routine from
Numerical Recipes which should provide you what you want (I've never
used it but I have used the NRC 2.0 version which has never given me a
problem).

Howard Onishi
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: Using the serial port of a SunSparc station to the data in real time
Next Topic: crossspectra

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 13:55:02 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00558 seconds