comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations [message #17237] Mon, 20 September 1999 00:00
Mirko Vukovic is currently offline  Mirko Vukovic
Messages: 124
Registered: January 1996
Senior Member
In article <7s4qie$51j$2@alster.dkrz.de>,
m218003@modell3.dkrz.de (Martin.Schultz@dkrz.de) wrote:
> In article <7s09tk$4v6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
> Mirko Vukovic <mvukovic@taz.telusa.com> writes:
>>
>> Another example is the Annotation type object. As someone cried out
for
>> TeX-like notation instead of the !- control sequences, this is
>> accomplished easily within such an object. You pass it the sequence
in
>> TeX-like notation, and when IDL needs it, it spews out the
>> !-like notation that IDL understainds. What is even better, you can
>> specify Annotation to use certain fonts by default (like roman
complex)
>
> Well, if you have a working version of ANNOTATE__DEFINE, I'd be glad
to
> receive a copy!
>
> Cheers,
> Martin
>
:-)
Not implemented yet !!!

I was writing what I was planning to do. Next time I'll keep my
fingers tied up. I'll post when I come up with something.

Apologies for raising false hopes.

Mirko


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Share what you know. Learn what you don't.
Re: Suggestion for IDL6 -- variable declarations [message #17238 is a reply to message #17237] Mon, 20 September 1999 00:00 Go to previous message
m218003 is currently offline  m218003
Messages: 56
Registered: August 1999
Member
In article <7s09tk$4v6$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
Mirko Vukovic <mvukovic@taz.telusa.com> writes:
>
> Another example is the Annotation type object. As someone cried out for
> TeX-like notation instead of the !- control sequences, this is
> accomplished easily within such an object. You pass it the sequence in
> TeX-like notation, and when IDL needs it, it spews out the
> !-like notation that IDL understainds. What is even better, you can
> specify Annotation to use certain fonts by default (like roman complex)


Well, if you have a working version of ANNOTATE__DEFINE, I'd be glad to
receive a copy!

Cheers,
Martin


--
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[[ Martin Schultz Max-Planck-Institut fuer Meteorologie [[
[[ Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg [[
[[ phone: +49 40 41173-308 [[
[[ fax: +49 40 441787 [[
[[ martin.schultz@dkrz.de [[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: FLASH - Colors Update
Next Topic: Best,Fastest platform for IDL 5.2 (NT or UNIX)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:16:32 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.20123 seconds