comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows? [message #1761] Thu, 03 February 1994 06:44
jacobsen is currently offline  jacobsen
Messages: 28
Registered: July 1992
Junior Member
In article <1994Feb2.192721.27923@nwra.com> mark@nwra.com (Mark Baldwin) writes:

Does anyone know of any significant problems or limitations using IDL
for Windows? We are currently running IDL on various Sun workstations,
and would like the same capabilities on a PC. Thanks for any comments.

I use IDL on Windows at home and IDL on RS/6000 and VAX at work.
The good side:
I can write IDL stuff at home (including widgets) and
it all works the same. It's so nice to
be able to write platform-independant code
so easily! Even for mouse-clicking stuff...
The bad side:
I have just 8 MB of memory. IDL gets horrendously slow
on the PC with large images (>256x256)
On IDL on VAX and Unix, the terminal window shows
your current prompt and previous lines all
together in one window. For some reason,
they chose to have a one-line window for
your current command and a separate window
for previous commands. I don't like that.
However, using up-arrow still pulls back
your previous command, so it's not so bad.
Call_external stuff is less straightforward on DOS.


--
*******************
Chris Jacobsen, Asst. Prof., Department of Physics, SUNY at Stony Brook
Phone (516) 632-8093, FAX -8101 Bitnet: cjacobsen@sbccmail
jacobsen@xray1.physics.sunysb.edu ALL-IN_ONE: CJACOBSEN
*******************
Re: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows? [message #1762 is a reply to message #1761] Thu, 03 February 1994 06:37 Go to previous message
jacobsen is currently offline  jacobsen
Messages: 28
Registered: July 1992
Junior Member
--
*******************
Chris Jacobsen, Asst. Prof., Department of Physics, SUNY at Stony Brook
Phone (516) 632-8093, FAX -8101 Bitnet: cjacobsen@sbccmail
jacobsen@xray1.physics.sunysb.edu ALL-IN_ONE: CJACOBSEN
*******************
Re: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows? [message #1763 is a reply to message #1762] Thu, 03 February 1994 05:27 Go to previous message
zawodny is currently offline  zawodny
Messages: 121
Registered: August 1992
Senior Member
We have IDL for Windows running to at least two PCs here. One is a
notebook 486DX-33 with 8MB of memory and the other is a desktop PC. Both
run all the software from our workstations. We make sure that files that
need to be portable are written in XDR format. The only real limitation is
imposed by DOS and that is the 8 character limit on file names. Our Notebook
PC has a 64 level grey scale LCD display and I am not currently able to use
my own "color" table with it. A help,/device tells me that Windows has
reserved 16 of the 64 available colors and that the device has a STATIC color
map. It is very likely that I just have not figured out how to use the thing
properly yet. All in all, my experiences with IDL for Windows has been very
good. I would recommend it as a reliable piece of software and faithful to
form of the IDLs running on the other platforms. OH, a fast graphics
accelerator make a big difference and should be considered a must.

--
Joseph M. Zawodny (KO4LW) NASA Langley Research Center
Internet: zawodny@arbd0.larc.nasa.gov MS-475, Hampton VA, 23681-0001
Packet: ko4lw@n4hog.va.usa
Re: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows? [message #1764 is a reply to message #1763] Wed, 02 February 1994 21:44 Go to previous message
dean is currently offline  dean
Messages: 55
Registered: March 1993
Member
I use IDL for Windows 3.5.1 on a 486. I am able to do display very
I use IDL for Windows 3.5.1 on a 486. We also have IDL 3.0 on a
VAX/VMS and I find I can do more on the PC than on the VAX/VMS. A
word of advice, make sure you have 8MB of RAM - 16MB would be better.
This is one thing I like about IDL. The WIDGETs I write for the VAX
work on the PC without any changes.

Kelly Dean
RE: Experiences w/ IDL for Windows? [message #1765 is a reply to message #1764] Wed, 02 February 1994 20:01 Go to previous message
nowicki is currently offline  nowicki
Messages: 11
Registered: May 1993
Junior Member
In Article <1994Feb2.192721.27923@nwra.com>
mark@nwra.com (Mark Baldwin) writes:
> Does anyone know of any significant problems or limitations using IDL
> for Windows? We are currently running IDL on various Sun workstations,
> and would like the same capabilities on a PC. Thanks for any comments.
>
> Mark Baldwin (mark@nwra.com)
>

We are running IDL on VAXes, Alpha's, and PC's. There has been virtually
no code changes made between the various systems (filenames, yes, with DOS'
8 and 3 character filename restriction). We needed to kick our RAM up to
32 megs in order to get the same performance as our VAXes.

-Greg

/* Greg Nowicki | Mail Stop 401A | LIDAR Applications Group */
/* NASA Langley Research Center | Hampton, Virginia 23681-0001 */
/* Voice: (804) 864-2713 | FAX: (804) 864-7790 */
/* nowicki@tardis.larc.nasa.gov | My opinions and mine alone . . . */
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Re: Bug in WAVE/WAVE Advantage Routine SUM
Next Topic: HELP: Eigenvalue/vector routine? (better than TQLI?)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:06:03 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00546 seconds