comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Bounding Box in IDL postscript output
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Bounding Box in IDL postscript output [message #9796] Thu, 21 August 1997 00:00 Go to next message
titus is currently offline  titus
Messages: 1
Registered: August 1997
Junior Member
Hi,

how can i force IDL 5.0 to generate well sized bounding boxes in
the postscript output ? These boxes are usually too large and if
i use color keys or some other additional graphics the bounding
box doesn't include these extra graphics.

Any idea ?

Thanks


--

| Matthias.Rueggeberg@physik.th-darmstadt.de | Tel ++49 6151 162786 |
| http://www.physik.th-darmstadt/nlp/~titus | Fax ++49 6151 164534 |
Re: Bounding [message #17699 is a reply to message #9796] Tue, 09 November 1999 00:00 Go to previous message
Ben Tupper is currently offline  Ben Tupper
Messages: 186
Registered: August 1999
Senior Member
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
Brian wrote:
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>I am looking for some help with interpolating a surface
from ungridded
<br>data points.&nbsp; I have several thousand measurements in a river
with
<br>corresponding latitudes and longitudes for each of the points.&nbsp;
I would
<br>like to make a surface of these data, but have run into a small
<br>problem.&nbsp; I have been using a combination of TRIANGULATE and TRIGRID
to
<br>grid the data into a surface, however I end up with data being
<br>interpolated outside the bounds of the river.&nbsp; Is there any way
to bound
<br>the resulting grid to only include data within the river banks?</blockquote>

<p><br>I have bumped into the same problem with marine surveys around irregular
coastlines.&nbsp;&nbsp; I usually have difficulty with concavity in the
horizontal scatter of the data.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; If the data is scattered
in a convex hull pattern, use the boundary nodes (from boundary keyword
to triangulate ....
<p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; "B An optional, named variable that, upon return,
contains a list of the indices of the boundary points in counterclockwise
order.")
<p>&nbsp;to limit the extrapolation.&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Unfortunately, river
bends will introduce a concavity into that outer hull.&nbsp; The best solution
I have come up with is to manually digitize a polygon shape around the
ROI that I want to keep and mask all points outside the polygon.&nbsp;&nbsp;
If the riverbanks are well mapped (vectorized), you maybe able to lift
the riverbank coordinates from your dataset and use those values.&nbsp;&nbsp;
It's a brute force solution but has worked well so far.&nbsp; I really
would like to solve this problem differently.
<blockquote TYPE=CITE>Also,is there any way to determine a variance associated
with the
<br>interpolation?
<br>&nbsp;
<br>&nbsp;</blockquote>
I'm not sure what you mean.&nbsp;&nbsp; You can interpolate the gridded
value for the original X, Y locations and then perform statistics on the
interpolated values vs.&nbsp;the original data values.
<p>Hope it helps,
<br>Ben
<pre>--&nbsp;
Ben Tupper

Bigelow Laboratory for Ocean Science
tupper@seadas.bigelow.org

Pemaquid River Company
pemaquidriver@tidewater.net</pre>
&nbsp;</html>
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Clearing fields in widgets
Next Topic: Re: pulldown menu with multiple selections - Yes we can!

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 11:44:51 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00598 seconds