comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Kudos to RSI

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Kudos to RSI [message #18504 is a reply to message #18496]

Wed, 05 January 2000 00:00

Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000

Senior Member

David Fanning wrote:
> I've been doing a LOT of IDL programming lately. In fact,
> I think these programs (which rely heavily on object techniques)
> are the best IDL programs I have *ever* written. When I submit
> them to the IDL Programming Credentials committee later this month,
> I wouldn't be a bit surprised if I get bumped up to the "Pretty Damn
> Professional" category of programmer. Well, at least if I have
> time to add a little more documentation to the code. :-)

David,

I look forward to seeing these new programs. I'm reminded of the four
levels of competence:

(1) Unconsciously incompetent
(2) Consciously incompetent
(3) Consciously competent
(4) Unconsciously competent

Regarding IDL competence, I hope to graduate to level (4) sometime this
millenium :-)

Cheers,
Liam.

--
Liam E. Gumley
Space Science and Engineering Center, UW-Madison
http://cimss.ssec.wisc.edu/~gumley

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Kudos to RSI By: davidf on Thu, 06 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: davidf on Thu, 06 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: Peter Mason on Thu, 06 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: Michael Lefsky on Thu, 06 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 05 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: davidf on Wed, 05 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: Mirko Vukovic on Wed, 05 January 2000 00:00
		Re: Kudos to RSI By: Liam E. Gumley on Wed, 05 January 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	Surface Rendering from Stereo-pairs
Next Topic:	Re: Help reading MAC ASCII in windows. Solution from IDL

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 14:53:28 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.12063 seconds