comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Cholesky factorisation

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Cholesky factorisation

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Cholesky factorisation [message #18977]

Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00

Pavel Romashkin
Messages: 166
Registered: April 1999

Senior Member

I can't help hearing some sarcasm regarding IDL in David McClain's postings.
Why is that? After all, accepting computer's numerical precision is a matter of
faith, too, especially in life-critical applications Raytheon is developing. I
find using upper-level language like IDL very convenient, and availability of
"lower-level" tools like pointers is nice. C is great, but so is IDL I think.
If we don't trust functions written by others, we might as well wright
everything ourselves in C...

Cheers,
Pavel

David McClain wrote:

> I use the method shown in Numerical Recipes, 2nd Ed. Coding in C and being
> clever allows it to run in under 3 microsec on a 6x6 array, which is a size
> commonly needed by one of our analyses. Doing it externally allows for both
> speed and error handling as you would want it. It also guarantees
> correctness, as verified by you, the coder; something that RSI would have
> you accept as a matter of faith...
>
> David McClain, Sr. Scientist
> Raytheon Systems Co.
> Tucson, AZ

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Cholesky factorisation By: Pavel Romashkin on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00
		Re: Cholesky factorisation By: David McClain on Tue, 22 February 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic
Next Topic:	interpolation?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Nov 28 10:06:56 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16142 seconds