| Re: idl2matlab translate-o-matic [message #19028 is a reply to message #19024] |
Wed, 23 February 2000 00:00   |
Mark D. Williams
Messages: 15
Registered: November 1999
|
Junior Member |
|
|
William Thompson wrote:
> Personally, I mainly use IDL on Unix workstations, and never use idltool--I
> tend to feel it just gets in the way. I certainly would never use the editor
> built into idltool except in desperation, even on a PC, simply because I'm so
> used to using emacs. :^)
>
> My vote is for allowing a user-defined alternative editor.
Wow, this thread is really covering a wide swath of
topics! As long as we're on the topic of editors,
I'll put in a plug for Visual SlickEdit
http://www.slickedit.com
By far the most customizable, extensible and all
around flexible development environment
I've found for writing code (PV-WAVE, java, C,
C++, Fortran, perl, SQL, you name it, SlickEdit
has a mode for it). Has a fully implemented
emacs mode, as well as vi. Best yet, it runs
not only on Windows, but a broad spectrum of UNIX flavors
as well. Displays a sidebar navigation tool with
links to all procedures (PRO), functions (FUNCTION),
etc. that are in your source code. One click and you're
there.
I couldn't get by without it.
Regards,
M. Williams
Resource Engineering, Inc.
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
