comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » better atan function?

Home » Public Forums » archive » better atan function?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

better atan function? [message #20238]

Tue, 30 May 2000 00:00

R
Messages: 4
Registered: May 2000

Junior Member

Greetings all,

I have found that the phase I get from the FFT has
a precision of only ~10e-8, and that the precision depends
on what value phase has.

I think I've traced this to the atan function, or perhaps the
division that takes place in the atan function.

Does anyone have a better atan function (more precise)?

Or is this merely the way it is when one is bumping up against
precision errors?

By comparison, my "simulation" does get the amplitudes
of the spectral components to a precision of ~10e-14 or so.
(as expected for double precision variables, and no noise)

cheers,
bob
stockwell (at) co-ra (dot) com

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		better atan function? By: R on Tue, 30 May 2000 00:00
		Re: better atan function? By: Liam E. Gumley on Thu, 01 June 2000 00:00

Previous Topic:	Math Libraries in PVWAVE
Next Topic:	ANNOUNCE: spice-dlm, an IDL interface to the SPICE toolkit

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 15:17:37 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.28147 seconds