comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: keyword issue (top 10 IDL request?)
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: keyword issue (top 10 IDL request?) [message #20768] Wed, 19 July 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
promashkin is currently offline  promashkin
Messages: 169
Registered: December 1999
Senior Member
This matter has been discussed here before, and, in fact, is one of the
few that are well covered in the manual. KEYWORD_SET is *only* to be
used to check *status* ot keywords (for "trigger" keywords) that you
either *set* or don't, using "/":

pro temp, plot=plot
if keyword_set(plot) then plot, indgen(10) $
else print, 'No keyword - no plotting!'
end

For KEYWORD_SET, value of zero means "not set", just like /SENSITIVE is
the same as SENSITIVE=1 or SENSITIVE=2, while SENSITIVE=0 means "turn it
off" (for WIDGET_CONTROL procedure).
If your keyword is used to pass (numerical) values, you should, just as
Andy pointed out, use N_ELEMENTS instead of KEYWORD_SET:

pro temp, plot=plot
if n_elements(plot) gt 0 then $
case plot of
0: ; do nothing
1: plot, indgen(10)
2: plot_3dbox, indgen(10), indgen(10), indgen(10)
else: ; do nothing
endcase
end

Cheers,
Pavel


Kenneth Mankoff wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> here is another thing with current versions of IDL that causes problems
> and confuses me:
>
> a keyword set to 0 should not be undefined, it should be defined as zero.
> For example:
>
> IDL> create_globe, lat=90, long=0, ...
> I want create_globe to put longitude 0 at the center of the image (i.e.
> pass "0" to map_set). But if i don't use long= at all, then it should be
> undefined, and the following code should run (inside create_globe)
> IF ( NOT KEYWORD_SET( long ) ) THEN long = 277.5 ;;; geomagnetic pole '98
>
> However, the above line of code runs even if i set long to "0". I have
> been using long=0.1 as a work-around, but this is an ugly hack that others
> might not think to use.
>
> any ideas to fix this are welcome, and if no one has any good ideas, then
> please add this to your top ten list, David Fanning.
>
> Thanks,
> ken.
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Hints for optical flow analysis anyone?
Next Topic: keyword issue (top 10 IDL request?)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 12:40:42 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.25373 seconds