comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: what happened to time/date functions?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: what happened to time/date functions? [message #21585 is a reply to message #21584] Fri, 01 September 2000 15:55 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
William Daffer is currently offline  William Daffer
Messages: 34
Registered: February 1999
Member
Mirko Vukovic <mvukovic@taz.telusa.com> writes:

> In article <MPG.14198bc9d020ee9989c19@news.frii.com>,
> davidf@dfanning.com (David Fanning) wrote:
>> Mirko Vukovic (mvukovic@taz.telusa.com) writes:
>>
>>> I'm runing idl 5.3.1 on windows nt, and cannot access
>>> the time and date functions introduced in 5.1.
>>>
>>> Am I on the correct planet, or have I missed something?.
>>
>> No, Mirko, you've been in a time warp. Those things
>> disappeared in IDL 5.2. Not Y2K compatible, I guess. :-)
>>
>> Check out the Label_Date function. And there are some
>> neat new things in IDL 5.4 (a TimeGen function, for
>> example). I think most everyone though is using the
>> date/time functions available on either the Johns
>> Hopkins Applied Physics Lab or NASA Astronomy ftp
>> sites.
>
> thanks,
>
> hm, I saw nothing in the list of obsolete routines.
> Thanks for the pointer to the other libraries. As for
> 5.4, well, some of us are mere mortals :-)
>
> have a good weekend
>
> Mirko
>

They weren't really 'obsoleted' since the functionality wasn't
replaced, just removed. If you skipped from 5.1 to 5.3, as I did,
these routines just *disappeared*.

I think this whole thing was handled pretty badly. Apparently few
share my concern since most everyone else seems to be using the
JHAPL routines and so the loss of this functionality is a 'eh... so
what?' sort of thing for them. But it does demonstrate that RSI will
remove whole blocks of functionality without much warning.

On the plus side, I can't think of another such 'block of
functionality' which might share characteristics making it liable to
a similar fate as these routines, so I imagine we won't see such
wholesale decimation of the code base again.

If you want these routines back, see my other message in this
thread. I use these routines all the time with no problem. Just
don't use 2 digit years and you'll be fine.

William
--
Ab hoc possum videre domum tuum.
Public Key: http://home.earthlink.net/~whdaffer/#PGP-public-key
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDLgrContour is hiding
Next Topic: Re: IDLgrContour is hiding

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 10:02:23 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.47874 seconds