Re: IDLgrROI and normalized coords [message #21707] |
Mon, 11 September 2000 13:08 |
promashkin
Messages: 169 Registered: December 1999
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Ok, I found it on Deja. Its a bug. Never mind the question.
Thanks,
Pavel
Pavel Romashkin wrote:
>
> Hi,
> Is IDLgrROI insensitive to *coord_conv keywords? I tried to set them to
> all kinds of things, but nothing seems to make the object to actually
> use the conversion. I checked the object and the *coord_conv do get set,
> but displaying does not change at all.
> What I mean is this. Unless I pass the X and Y arrays to it only as
> normalized data, the IDLgrROI gets displayed properly no matter what the
> settings of *coord_conv are. If I pass the data in data coordinates, and
> set the *coord_conv keywords (just like for the rest of object graphics
> atoms), the ROI object seems to ignore the scaling and displays just as
> it would if *coord_conv were all set to [0, 1], i.e., if the data values
> are >1, they disappear from the screen.
> I would appreciate any advice (preferably leading to the answer :-).
> Sincerely,
> Pavel
|
|
|
Re: IDLgrROI and normalized coords [message #21712 is a reply to message #21707] |
Mon, 11 September 2000 11:01  |
promashkin
Messages: 169 Registered: December 1999
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Sorry, folks. I tried to read this after I posted it and it is
absolutely incomprehensible. Let me try again:
What I mean is this. If I set the X and Y arrays in IDLgrROI as
normalized data, the object it displayed properly no matter what the
settings of *coord_conv are. If I use X and Y in data coordinates, and
set the *coord_conv keywords (just like for the rest of object graphics
atoms), the IDLgrROI seems to ignore the scaling and displays just as it
would if *coord_conv were all set to [0, 1], i.e., if the data values
are >1, they disappear from the screen.
Sincerely,
Pavel
P. S. I guess, I need to disappear again and attend that language school :-(
|
|
|