| Re: IDL PV-WAVE [message #21939] |
Fri, 06 October 2000 00:00  |
Martin Schultz
Messages: 515
Registered: August 1997
|
Senior Member |
|
|
markusreichstein@my-deja.com wrote:
>
> Incredible,
> no one wants to answer questions about the relationship between IDL and
> PV-WAVE. I posted a mail 2 months ago, curious about IDL, now there was
> the mail 'Curious' about 'PV-WAVE', with answers about IDL and KODAK....
>
> So what's the history of those two ? (in evolution very unlikely two
> organisms with a nearly equal 'syntax' emerge) Is one the copy of the
> other?
>
> What are their respective merits? (I use PV-WAVE...) Is the rumor
> right, that IDL cannot perform correctly non-linear parameter
> estimation, like the ISML Stats package in WAVE?
>
> When I'll have do with simulation modelling and remote sensing, should I
> stick to WAVE or take the (now risky??) option IDL?
>
> I bet that someone knows the answers to these questions. Are they too
> boring?
>
> Markus Reichstein -- Ecosystem Ecology -- University of Bayreuth
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
Sorry Markus, but this question has really become too boring over
time. You will find some information about this in the FAQ
( http://www.ivsoftware.com/fom/IDL/public/fom-serve/cache/1.h tml) or
if you search deja.com.
Martin
--
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[[ Dr. Martin Schultz Max-Planck-Institut fuer Meteorologie [[
[[ Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg [[
[[ phone: +49 40 41173-308 [[
[[ fax: +49 40 41173-298 [[
[[ martin.schultz@dkrz.de [[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
