comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22815] Thu, 07 December 2000 10:24
Paul Woodford is currently offline  Paul Woodford
Messages: 43
Registered: June 2000
Member
In article <3A2EA104.8AB16D75@astro.princeton.edu>, David V Bowen
<dvb@astro.princeton.edu> wrote:

> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0

That would be me. I gave up on 7.0 and reverted to 6.1 (with all the
security patches, of course...). I tried adding compatibility
libraries, but I'm not sure if I did it correctly. I am wondering now
if my problem may have actually been some SCSI flakiness that I
discovered shortly thereafter, but I don't have enough motivation to
check.

I really hope Mac OS X gives us Mac ease-of-use combined with unix
stability....

--
Paul Woodford, Ph.D.
Essex Corporation

For faster email response, replace us dot net with essexcorp dot com
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22817 is a reply to message #22815] Thu, 07 December 2000 09:49 Go to previous message
Nick Bower is currently offline  Nick Bower
Messages: 43
Registered: June 1999
Member
fyi, my 6.1 firewall underwent numerous port-scans earlier this year by one or
more people trying to get a way in. they didn't. the simple rules are,

1. don't use nfs/nis and sendmail unless you know what you're doing. it takes
approximately 3 clicks to turn these services off.

2. be aware of security updates on redhat or other distro sites. hell - at
least redhat (and other distros) get them out within a day or two of a known
flaw. i think we all know what the proprietory security model of the
alternative is like.


> A word to the wise!
>
> And a reply from another colleague
>
> Telnet is a notorious weak point. Better to always use the more secure SSH.

this is highly misleading - the reason for your colleague's comment is that
telnet, ftp, pop3, etc. all transfer passwords as plain text which may be very
easilly sniffed by someone on the same subnet. ssh doesn't because of its
public key encryption. telnet isn't some flakey door that lets people in more
easilly.

nick
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22823 is a reply to message #22817] Thu, 07 December 2000 09:16 Go to previous message
Richard French is currently offline  Richard French
Messages: 173
Registered: December 2000
Senior Member
On the topic of Linux and RedHat, just got this alert from two colleagues:

just got the following messages from colleagues at other institutions
using RedHat Linux 6:

I've just learned that my Linux box (Dell Optiplex running RedHat 6)
has been hacked into twice in the last week. No damage seems to have
been done, but they used my computer as a platform to hack into others
which were damaged. A chemistry prof with the same system has also
been hacked. Apparently it's a weakness in version 6, which is absent
in 7 (not sure about 6.2). So this is just a warning to any of you
with similar setups to be careful. One time might have been from
on-campus here, but the second seems to have come from New Mexico
State in Las Cruces. My hacking was done once through ftp, which we
then disabled; the second was through telnet, which we have now also
disabled. The cure is to offload everything onto another machine,
install RH7, and then move it all back.

A word to the wise!

And a reply from another colleague

Telnet is a notorious weak point. Better to always use the more secure SSH.

I had a similar problem last summer.
Our computer center hardened up my RedHat unix system with a piece of
software called Bastille.
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22825 is a reply to message #22823] Thu, 07 December 2000 08:00 Go to previous message
Vapuser is currently offline  Vapuser
Messages: 63
Registered: November 1998
Member
And I did a clean install of redhat 7 *and* idl 5.4 and have had no
problems!

It would be nice if RSI put together an RPM (assuming that they
haven't). That would solve the problem of the missing dependencies.

whd

Kenneth Mankoff <mankoff@lasp.colorado.edu> writes:

> not sure what this email means for me, because i did a clean rh7
> install, and idl worked fine. That is IDL 5.3, not 5.4.
>
> -k.
>
> On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, David V Bowen wrote:
>
>> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
>> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0 (I'm sorry, I lost their Email and
>> can't remember their name). Hopefully by now they've figured out how to
>> fix it, but in case they haven't... I was talking to a colleague a few
>> days ago, who reported a similar problem after a clean installation of
>> RH7. The problem, he discovered, was that there are some libraries
>> missing which IDL needs but which don't come with RH7. Anyone who
>> upgrades to v7 won't notice any problems 'cause the libraries _used_ to
>> exist in v6, but anyone doing a new installation will be unable to start
>> IDL. If anyone is still struggling with these issues, I can get some
>> more details if they contact me directly.
>>
>> Dave Bowen
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------
>> Department of Astrophysical Sciences,
>> Peyton Hall, Princeton University, NJ 08544-1001
>> Ph (609) 258 3822, FAX (609) 258 1020
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>

--
William Daffer: 818-354-0161: William.Daffer@jpl.nasa.gov
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22833 is a reply to message #22825] Thu, 07 December 2000 08:02 Go to previous message
Nigel Wade is currently offline  Nigel Wade
Messages: 286
Registered: March 1998
Senior Member
David V Bowen wrote:
>
> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0 (I'm sorry, I lost their Email and
> can't remember their name). Hopefully by now they've figured out how to
> fix it, but in case they haven't... I was talking to a colleague a few
> days ago, who reported a similar problem after a clean installation of
> RH7. The problem, he discovered, was that there are some libraries
> missing which IDL needs but which don't come with RH7. Anyone who
> upgrades to v7 won't notice any problems 'cause the libraries _used_ to
> exist in v6, but anyone doing a new installation will be unable to start
> IDL. If anyone is still struggling with these issues, I can get some
> more details if they contact me directly.
>
> Dave Bowen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------
> Department of Astrophysical Sciences,
> Peyton Hall, Princeton University, NJ 08544-1001
> Ph (609) 258 3822, FAX (609) 258 1020

libXpm wasn't it?

I don't trust their use of a development snapshot of gcc rather
than a stable release. I'm waiting until 7.1 comes out before upgrading.
Which also follows the usual rule of skipping .0 releases.

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nigel Wade, System Administrator, Space Plasma Physics Group,
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
E-mail : nmw@ion.le.ac.uk
Phone : +44 (0)116 2523568, Fax : +44 (0)116 2523555
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22836 is a reply to message #22825] Thu, 07 December 2000 07:30 Go to previous message
Nigel Wade is currently offline  Nigel Wade
Messages: 286
Registered: March 1998
Senior Member
Mark Hadfield wrote:
>
> "David V Bowen" <dvb@astro.princeton.edu> wrote in message
> news:3A2EA104.8AB16D75@astro.princeton.edu...
>> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
>> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0 ...
>> ...The problem, he discovered, was that there are some libraries
>> missing which IDL needs but which don't come with RH7. Anyone who
>> upgrades to v7 won't notice any problems 'cause the libraries _used_ to
>> exist in v6, but anyone doing a new installation will be unable to start
>> IDL....
>
> I thought only Windows suffered from DLL Hell!
>
> ---
> Mark Hadfield
> m.hadfield@niwa.cri.nz http://katipo.niwa.cri.nz/~hadfield/
> National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research
> PO Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand

Linux is gradually becoming more like Windows in every way ;-)

--
-----------------------------------------------------------
Nigel Wade, System Administrator, Space Plasma Physics Group,
University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH, UK
E-mail : nmw@ion.le.ac.uk
Phone : +44 (0)116 2523568, Fax : +44 (0)116 2523555
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22844 is a reply to message #22823] Thu, 07 December 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
Paul van Delst is currently offline  Paul van Delst
Messages: 364
Registered: March 1997
Senior Member
Richard French wrote:
>
> On the topic of Linux and RedHat, just got this alert from two colleagues:
>
> just got the following messages from colleagues at other institutions
> using RedHat Linux 6:

<snip desc of crackers getting into system>

This isn't just an issue for linux. Just recently a Sun system I work on had been cracked (via the
ftp server). It's happened to big SGI boxes too. I would be amazed if *any* system *hasn't* been
cracked into. I can't comment on whether linux is more susceptible but I doubt it (on a per capita
basis).

> A word to the wise!
>
> And a reply from another colleague
>
> Telnet is a notorious weak point. Better to always use the more secure SSH.

Good lord. Doesn't *everyone* use SSH nowadays??? :o) If you are at some sort of institution that
has any sort of number crunching capability (that can be used for breaking into even more secure
machines) I hope that there are people employed just to watch out for this sort of thing.

paulv

--
Paul van Delst Ph: (301) 763-8000 x7274
CIMSS @ NOAA/NCEP Fax: (301) 763-8545
Rm.207, 5200 Auth Rd. Email: pvandelst@ncep.noaa.gov
Camp Springs MD 20746
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22847 is a reply to message #22844] Wed, 06 December 2000 13:36 Go to previous message
Mark Hadfield is currently offline  Mark Hadfield
Messages: 783
Registered: May 1995
Senior Member
"David V Bowen" <dvb@astro.princeton.edu> wrote in message
news:3A2EA104.8AB16D75@astro.princeton.edu...
> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0 ...
> ...The problem, he discovered, was that there are some libraries
> missing which IDL needs but which don't come with RH7. Anyone who
> upgrades to v7 won't notice any problems 'cause the libraries _used_ to
> exist in v6, but anyone doing a new installation will be unable to start
> IDL....

I thought only Windows suffered from DLL Hell!

---
Mark Hadfield
m.hadfield@niwa.cri.nz http://katipo.niwa.cri.nz/~hadfield/
National Institute for Water and Atmospheric Research
PO Box 14-901, Wellington, New Zealand
Re: IDL and RedHat version 7.0 [message #22853 is a reply to message #22847] Wed, 06 December 2000 00:00 Go to previous message
Kenneth Mankoff is currently offline  Kenneth Mankoff
Messages: 42
Registered: August 1999
Member
not sure what this email means for me, because i did a clean rh7 install,
and idl worked fine. That is IDL 5.3, not 5.4.

-k.

On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, David V Bowen wrote:

> About a month ago someone contacted me about their problems getting IDL
> to run under Linux & RedHat v7.0 (I'm sorry, I lost their Email and
> can't remember their name). Hopefully by now they've figured out how to
> fix it, but in case they haven't... I was talking to a colleague a few
> days ago, who reported a similar problem after a clean installation of
> RH7. The problem, he discovered, was that there are some libraries
> missing which IDL needs but which don't come with RH7. Anyone who
> upgrades to v7 won't notice any problems 'cause the libraries _used_ to
> exist in v6, but anyone doing a new installation will be unable to start
> IDL. If anyone is still struggling with these issues, I can get some
> more details if they contact me directly.
>
> Dave Bowen
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------ --------
> Department of Astrophysical Sciences,
> Peyton Hall, Princeton University, NJ 08544-1001
> Ph (609) 258 3822, FAX (609) 258 1020
>
>
>
>
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: DCOM and Active X
Next Topic: brain twister

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 15:14:45 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00726 seconds