| Re: GIF again..... [message #23075] |
Fri, 05 January 2001 17:14  |
John-David T. Smith
Messages: 384
Registered: January 2000
|
Senior Member |
|
|
"Richard G. French" wrote:
>
> After 5.4 came out, there were a lot of posts about the disappearance
> of the GIF writer and reader routines. Can any of you experts tell me
> about the legality of using shareware C code that reads and writes
> GIF files, originally used as part of the XV program that displays
> lots of image types on UNIX boxes? The idea would be to write
> wrapper routines that could call WriteGIF and ReadGIF in the XV
> code so that GIF writing and reading could be restored in IDL.
>
> These routines are in the pub/xv subdirectory of
> ftp.cis.upenn.edu
>
> If this is not legal, does it mean that XV is not legal,
> either, even if you pay the registration fee?
>
> Has anyone come up with a legal scheme under UNIX to
> read and write GIF files? If you have to pay a license fee, does
> anyone know what the fee would be for a single user?
> Thanks for any hints on workarounds.
> Dick French
http://www.imagemagick.org/
Seems to be the way to go. Some enterprising tester of Ronn Kling's
book could even create a DLM which links to the ImageMagick libraries
and write GIF's directly. Given that PNG is a better format
(http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngintro.html), especially for the web,
maybe the interim convert-from-png route is preferrable. We don't want
to make writing GIF's *too* easy. For those who don't know of the GIF
(or rather LZW compression) issue:
http://cloanto.com/users/mcb/19950127giflzw.html
JD
|
|
|
|
| Re: GIF again..... [message #23174 is a reply to message #23075] |
Fri, 05 January 2001 17:23  |
Richard French
Messages: 173
Registered: December 2000
|
Senior Member |
|
|
JD Smith wrote:
>
>
> http://www.imagemagick.org/
>
> Seems to be the way to go. Some enterprising tester of Ronn Kling's
> book could even create a DLM which links to the ImageMagick libraries
> and write GIF's directly. Given that PNG is a better format
> (http://www.libpng.org/pub/png/pngintro.html), especially for the web,
> maybe the interim convert-from-png route is preferrable. We don't want
> to make writing GIF's *too* easy. For those who don't know of the GIF
> (or rather LZW compression) issue:
> http://cloanto.com/users/mcb/19950127giflzw.html
>
> JD
That imagemagick site looks terrific - thanks for the tip.
I am happy to discontinue creating gifs, but I have about
1000 gifs I've made already that I would like to be able to read!
I am sure this is a problem for others as well, and it really
is crippling to many people. I know several people who are
not upgrading to IDL5.4 for just this reason.
Dick
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
