comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Many procedures, what to do?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Many procedures, what to do? [message #23190 is a reply to message #23188] Fri, 12 January 2001 12:09 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
Craig Markwardt is currently offline  Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996
Senior Member
Hmm, that would be nice, but can that work on IDL < 5.3?

Not-living-in-the-here-and-now-when-it-comes-to-IDL-versions Craig

"Pavel A. Romashkin" <pavel.romashkin@noaa.gov> writes:

> How about using compile_opt, strictarr? It will eliminate the need for
> forward_function. I use it all the time and have no worries about IDL
> mixing functions with arrays. This way, the caller does not need
> compiled library functions to know they are functions - the syntax of
> the call implies that they are, and will be available at the execution time.
>
> Cheers,
> Pavel

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: Re: Code for Dynamically creating and repositioning Buttons during IDL runtime
Next Topic: CW_Field Observation

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 20:21:53 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.16158 seconds