comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Many procedures, what to do?

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Many procedures, what to do?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Many procedures, what to do? [message #23197 is a reply to message #23190]

Fri, 12 January 2001 08:42

Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000

Senior Member

How about using compile_opt, strictarr? It will eliminate the need for
forward_function. I use it all the time and have no worries about IDL
mixing functions with arrays. This way, the caller does not need
compiled library functions to know they are functions - the syntax of
the call implies that they are, and will be available at the execution time.

Cheers,
Pavel

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: davidf on Fri, 12 January 2001 17:41
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: jeyadev on Fri, 12 January 2001 16:41
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 12 January 2001 15:41
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 12 January 2001 14:14
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 12 January 2001 12:09
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 12 January 2001 08:42
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Jaco van Gorkom on Fri, 12 January 2001 08:50
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Paul van Delst on Fri, 12 January 2001 08:05
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: davidf on Fri, 12 January 2001 07:40
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 12 January 2001 07:11
		Re: Many procedures, what to do? By: davidf on Thu, 11 January 2001 16:35

Previous Topic:	Re: Code for Dynamically creating and repositioning Buttons during IDL runtime
Next Topic:	CW_Field Observation

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sat Oct 11 06:36:58 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 2.00119 seconds