comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: speed comparison of IDL, numPy, Matlab
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: speed comparison of IDL, numPy, Matlab [message #23661 is a reply to message #23658] Mon, 05 February 2001 21:44 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Lees is currently offline  David Lees
Messages: 1
Registered: February 2001
Junior Member
Paul,

Thanks for the URL to pydl. It looks quite interesting.

I am a Python newbie, but your comments Python syntax and being "wordy"
seem a bit misplaced. The 'for' statement could have been written with
a 'range' so that it looks similar to the IDL for statement. The
wordiness of Python relative to IDL or Matlab is just due to the built
in functions used, not something inherent in Python. A function could
easily be defined for generating the uniform square matrices used in the
benchmark. I really like the balance that Python achieves between
clarity and program length. Certainly there have been languages like
APL that were far more compact than IDL or Matlab, but they were a bit
cryptic for my taste.

david lees


Paul van Delst wrote:
>
> Benyang Tang wrote:
>>
>> Out of curiosity, I did a quick benchmark test of IDL, NumPy and Matlab on my
>> desktop machine. I know benchmarking is a complicated issue; don't take my
>> naive test too serious.
>
> O.k. :o)
>
> I've never used Python, and Matlab only once or twice, but what's with the Python syntax?
> Seems a tad wordy. Looks like Nick Bower's IDL-like package in Python
> (http://nickbower.com/computer/pydl) is worth another look though......
>
> paulv
>
<snip>
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL 5.4 and gifs
Next Topic: multiple filters take 2

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 15:09:49 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.48201 seconds