Re: New to Linux not IDL [message #23780] |
Wed, 21 February 2001 00:20  |
Ivan Zimine
Messages: 40 Registered: February 1999
|
Member |
|
|
Vapuser wrote:
>
> I've put IDL on a redhat 7 system. The only problem I've had is with
> the license manager, not that this isn't a small problem since this
> is the way RSI prefers to do the licensing. When I had an
> evaluation sort of license that didn't require the license manager,
> I had no problem.
>
> There is a bug report in on the license manager issue but it only
> went in on Friday. Besides, it's unclear to me that this isn't a
> problem with my particular installation hardware (bp6 board with
> dual celerons). It may be that other, less exotic installations will
> have no problems at all.
$RSI_DIR/idl_5.4/bin/bin.linux.x86/idl_lmgrd seems to be linked to
libc5.
I've replaced it with a copy from IDL 5.2.1L and everything works fine.
I don't think I have old libc installed on my system (SuSE 6.4,
k2.2.16).
--
Ivan Zimine | ivan.zimine@physics.unige.ch
Dpt. of Radiology | (+41 22) 372 70 70
Geneva University Hospitals |
|
|
|
Re: New to Linux not IDL [message #23784 is a reply to message #23780] |
Tue, 20 February 2001 11:57   |
Kenneth Mankoff
Messages: 42 Registered: August 1999
|
Member |
|
|
Hi Perry,
RSI may not officially support RH7.0, but I have had not problems using
IDL on it, and *think* that the same goes for many other people on this
newsgroup. I don't remember the thread topic but somewhere between 2 and 4
months ago there was a thread on IDL & RH7.0 The bugs were window manager
bugs, and other trivial things, if i remember correctly.
-k.
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
Kenneth Mankoff LASP
mankoff@lasp.colorado.edu 1234 Innovation Drive
303.492.3264(p) Boulder, CO 80303
------------------------------------------------------------ ------------
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Perry Phillips wrote:
> We are converting a Windows machine to Linux and would like to add IDL
> to it. RSI list Red Hat Linux 6.2 as the supported operating system.
> However, Red Hat is now only selling Red Hat 7. Does anyone have an idea
> when RSI will start support version 7. They seem to keep up with the Mac
> and Window operating systems. Is it true for Linux 86?
>
> --
> Perry Phillips p.phillips@mail.utexas.edu
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New to Linux not IDL [message #23787 is a reply to message #23786] |
Tue, 20 February 2001 11:42   |
nobody
Messages: 12 Registered: September 1995
|
Junior Member |
|
|
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 09:21:35 -0600, Perry Phillips <p.phillips@mail.utexas.edu>
wrote:
> We are converting a Windows machine to Linux and would like to add IDL
> to it. RSI list Red Hat Linux 6.2 as the supported operating system.
> However, Red Hat is now only selling Red Hat 7. Does anyone have an idea
> when RSI will start support version 7. They seem to keep up with the Mac
> and Window operating systems. Is it true for Linux 86?
>
> --
> Perry Phillips p.phillips@mail.utexas.edu
probably best to ask RSI, you may want to ask here (or in Linux ng's)
if anyone has tried it on RH 7.0 , AFAIK, the main changes to RH from
6.2 --> 7.0 are 2.2 --> 2.4 kernel and 3.3.x to 4.0.x XFree. I use IDL
with RH 6.x systems without a problem. my guess is that it would work OK,
if it's a new system, the worst you would have to do is downgrade X. but
no ___guarantees___ !!!
also, you can probably still download RH 6.x from their website or many
mirrors if 7.0 doesn't work out. set-up your system to dual-boot and then
install the demo IDL, you can then work out all the bugs before hand.
--
Steve S.
yubdub
steve@CLOTHESmailaps.org
remove CLOTHES before replying
|
|
|
Re: New to Linux not IDL [message #23874 is a reply to message #23780] |
Wed, 21 February 2001 08:26  |
Vapuser
Messages: 63 Registered: November 1998
|
Member |
|
|
Ivan Zimine <ivan.zimine@physics.unige.ch> writes:
> Vapuser wrote:
>>
>> I've put IDL on a redhat 7 system. The only problem I've had is with
>> the license manager, not that this isn't a small problem since this
>> is the way RSI prefers to do the licensing. When I had an
>> evaluation sort of license that didn't require the license manager,
>> I had no problem.
>>
>> There is a bug report in on the license manager issue but it only
>> went in on Friday. Besides, it's unclear to me that this isn't a
>> problem with my particular installation hardware (bp6 board with
>> dual celerons). It may be that other, less exotic installations will
>> have no problems at all.
>
> $RSI_DIR/idl_5.4/bin/bin.linux.x86/idl_lmgrd seems to be linked to
> libc5.
> I've replaced it with a copy from IDL 5.2.1L and everything works fine.
> I don't think I have old libc installed on my system (SuSE 6.4,
> k2.2.16).
>
*Interesting*. I haven't gone so far as to check the dependencies
issue.
Are you listening RSI?
Thanks!
whd
--
William Daffer: 818-354-0161: William.Daffer@jpl.nasa.gov
|
|
|