| Aspect Ratio problem [message #2405] |
Wed, 06 July 1994 16:06  |
trond
Messages: 9
Registered: June 1994
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Could somebody that may have done this before tell me: what is the
easiest way of plotting, in PostScript, an image with a contour overlaid,
and at the same time preserving the aspect ratio (square pixels)?
I am able to produce contour-overlaid-image plots, but the aspect ratio gets
messed up. And, it gets worse when I play around with the POSITION
variable, =8-o
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Thanks in advance
T
--
Trond S. Trondsen: =8) |x| _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ |x|
University of Calgary/Physics |x| _/ INSTITUTE FOR SPACE RESEARCH _/ |x|
LA1OEA/VE6NOR, BBS: LA3T |x| _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ |x|"hi!"
trond@phys.ucalgary.ca |x| Opinions are mine, not my employer's.|x| -me
|
|
|
|
| Re: Aspect Ratio problem [message #2500 is a reply to message #2405] |
Thu, 07 July 1994 01:19  |
stl
Messages: 70
Registered: February 1994
|
Member |
|
|
In article <Jul6.230656.33003@acs.ucalgary.ca> trond@smith.phys.ucalgary.ca (Trond Steinar Trondsen) writes:
> Could somebody that may have done this before tell me: what is the
> easiest way of plotting, in PostScript, an image with a contour overlaid,
> and at the same time preserving the aspect ratio (square pixels)?
>
> I am able to produce contour-overlaid-image plots, but the aspect ratio gets
> messed up. And, it gets worse when I play around with the POSITION
> variable, =8-o
>
Possible silly question: What is 'the aspect ratio'?
Ohhh. You mean that when printed, the contour is no longer directly
over the image??
I am confusded about what the problem is. I presume it is the
standard postscript confusing cause by scalable pixel sizes, etc..
Please elaborate.
-stephen
--
Stephen C Strebel / SKI TO DIE
strebel@sma.ch / and
Swiss Meteorological Institute, Zuerich / LIVE TO TELL ABOUT IT
01 256 93 85 / (and pray for snow)
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
