comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction)

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction)

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction) [message #24388]

Mon, 02 April 2001 04:21

Martin Schultz
Messages: 515
Registered: August 1997

Senior Member

David Fanning wrote:
>
> Martin Schultz (martin.schultz@dkrz.de) writes:
>
>> Sorry for replying to my own mail. But at least for german readers it
>> might be important to clarify that the salary is of course BAT IIa/Ib
>> (instead of IIa/I).
>
> Yeah, I was going to ask about that. What does that mean
> for American readers?

... that you should bring you rown food and a sleeping bag ;-) [just
kidding]. Th eexact salary depends on several factors such as age,
marital status, children, years in the public service (or equivalent)
sectors, ..... A rough estimate yields about
$45,000 per year net, which will leave you with on the order of
$25,000-$30,000 after taxes, social security, etc.

Cheers,

Martin

--
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[
[[ Dr. Martin Schultz Max-Planck-Institut fuer Meteorologie [[
[[ Bundesstr. 55, 20146 Hamburg [[
[[ phone: +49 40 41173-308 [[
[[ fax: +49 40 41173-298 [[
[[ martin.schultz@dkrz.de [[
[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[[ [[[[[[[

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction) By: Martin Schultz on Mon, 02 April 2001 04:21
		Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction) By: davidf on Fri, 30 March 2001 09:32
		Re: Wanted: Scientific Programmer (small correction) By: Martin Schultz on Fri, 30 March 2001 09:25

Previous Topic:	Key for IDL 5.4 for windows
Next Topic:	Re: Key for IDL 5.4 for windows

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Fri Oct 10 11:56:27 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.32076 seconds