| poly_2d [message #24493] |
Tue, 03 April 2001 07:25  |
pfis
Messages: 2
Registered: February 2001
|
Junior Member |
|
|
I am using poly_2d to warp an image. I am using 3 parameters for each
coordinate (e.g. xnew=a+bx+cy and similar for ynew). My problem is I am
having trouble choosing 'a' such that the center of the image (actually pixel
[64,64] of a 128x128 image) does not move. Using a=fix(-64.*(b+c-1.)) keeps
the center stationary to about 1 pixel which is not good enough. I wrote my
own version of the warping program which does what I want but is slower than
poly_2d. Any help would be appreciated.
Regards,
Phil
----- Posted via NewsOne.Net: Free (anonymous) Usenet News via the Web -----
http://newsone.net/ -- Free reading and anonymous posting to 60,000+ groups
NewsOne.Net prohibits users from posting spam. If this or other posts
made through NewsOne.Net violate posting guidelines, email abuse@newsone.net
|
|
|
|
| Re: poly_2d [message #24592 is a reply to message #24493] |
Fri, 06 April 2001 15:49  |
thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
|
Senior Member |
|
|
pfis@mytec.com writes:
> I am using poly_2d to warp an image. I am using 3 parameters for each
> coordinate (e.g. xnew=a+bx+cy and similar for ynew). My problem is I am
> having trouble choosing 'a' such that the center of the image (actually pixel
> [64,64] of a 128x128 image) does not move. Using a=fix(-64.*(b+c-1.)) keeps
> the center stationary to about 1 pixel which is not good enough. I wrote my
> own version of the warping program which does what I want but is slower than
> poly_2d. Any help would be appreciated.
I don't understand why you're using the FIX() function. I'm quite sure that
the input parameters to POLY_2D can (and should) be floating point.
In my own software, I use slightly different values of the parameter you call
A, depending on whether or not nearest neighbor interpolation is going to be
used. If I am using nearest neighbor, then I add 0.5 to A, specifically to
avoid the problem that you're encountering. In your example, this would be
A = -64.*(b+c-1.) + 0.5
However, for bilinear or cubic interpolation, I do not include the extra 0.5,
so that
A = -64.*(b+c-1.)
William Thompson
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
