comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » PostScript and pixmap
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
PostScript and pixmap [message #25889] Wed, 25 July 2001 17:03 Go to next message
<lalassne is currently offline  <lalassne
Messages: 3
Registered: May 2001
Junior Member
I am trying to take a plot that I have created and make it so that the
user can save it in several formats. I was hoping to include Post script
the plot has been put into a pixmap window


- Lisa A. Lassner


------------------------------------------------------------ -------------------
"We cannot do great things on this earth. We can only do small things
with great love."

-Mother Teresa
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #25927 is a reply to message #25889] Mon, 30 July 2001 08:41 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Pavel A. Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
David,
I too have PSCconfig in my path. But the last time I made a PS file for
a paper was a year ago :-( Too much data processing, when the only fancy
thing you ever get is fancy colorful expressions from the modelers to
whom "the measurements do not conform to the model" (just kidding :-).
Cheers,
Pavel
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #25936 is a reply to message #25889] Fri, 27 July 2001 16:54 Go to previous messageGo to next message
John-David T. Smith is currently offline  John-David T. Smith
Messages: 384
Registered: January 2000
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:
>
> Rick Towler writes:
>>
>> If you are new to PS output with IDL I suggest David Fanning's IDL book.
>> You might also want to check out Liam Gumley's new book too. Both are
>> available thru Amazon.
>
> I've been waiting in vain for someone to mention
> PSConfig, the best program I've ever written, but
> alas Ben Tupper and Martin Schultz are the only
> ones I know who use it. :-(
>
> But PSConfig will solve *all* your PostScript
> problems, I personally guarantee it. :-)
>

David,

I did once use PSConfig, but lately I've noticed it has gone the dark
side of object graphics. For people who (still) have 8-bit displays,
this can be an annoyance, when the color frenzy begins, and you've only
just tried to print. Is there a replacement up to date version still
using direct graphics?

JD
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #26014 is a reply to message #25889] Wed, 01 August 2001 11:14 Go to previous message
Pavel A. Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:
>
> P.S. Let's just say I've gone about 6 months now
> without saying DEVICE, DECOMPOSED=0, which I took
> to mean we had finally gotten the whole world
> over into the 24-bit graphics world.

You could ignore the whole rest of the world out there, but better keep
JD happy :-)
Cheers,
Pavel
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #26023 is a reply to message #25889] Wed, 01 August 2001 10:39 Go to previous message
david[2] is currently offline  david[2]
Messages: 100
Registered: June 2001
Senior Member
JD Smith writes:

> So, given this difficulty, is Object Graphics really necessary in
> PSConfig? It seems to draw some boxes, etc., but nothing requiring OG
> (as far as my limited knowledge of the latter allows me to infer). Is
> there a version laying around using DG?

Oh, man, that little thing with the sizing of the
plot window over in the "PostScript" window is
the *heart* of this program. I wouldn't use it
without that neat little feature! :-)

(Not to mention it took me a LONG time
to figure out how to do that!)

But, the whole feature *is* confined to a
single PLOTWINDOW object, so it would be
easy enough to subclass the draw method,
I suppose, to allow for direct graphics.

But probably not worth it for the 2-3 people
still stuck with 8-bit graphics (Linux users?). :-)

Cheers,

David

P.S. Let's just say I've gone about 6 months now
without saying DEVICE, DECOMPOSED=0, which I took
to mean we had finally gotten the whole world
over into the 24-bit graphics world. I should have
known better.

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #26026 is a reply to message #25889] Wed, 01 August 2001 09:51 Go to previous message
John-David T. Smith is currently offline  John-David T. Smith
Messages: 384
Registered: January 2000
Senior Member
David Fanning wrote:
>
> JD Smith writes:
>>
>> I did once use PSConfig, but lately I've noticed it has gone the dark
>> side of object graphics. For people who (still) have 8-bit displays,
>> this can be an annoyance, when the color frenzy begins, and you've only
>> just tried to print. Is there a replacement up to date version still
>> using direct graphics?
>
> Yes, for people still on the dark side, it is
> a problem. There is no practical way to combine
> direct graphics and object graphics in the same
> program on an 8-bit display. The two graphics
> systems just use colors in completely different
> ways, which (by definition) will cause havoc
> with the one physical color table.

So, given this difficulty, is Object Graphics really necessary in
PSConfig? It seems to draw some boxes, etc., but nothing requiring OG
(as far as my limited knowledge of the latter allows me to infer). Is
there a version laying around using DG?

JD
Re: PostScript and pixmap [message #26040 is a reply to message #25936] Wed, 01 August 2001 05:23 Go to previous message
david[2] is currently offline  david[2]
Messages: 100
Registered: June 2001
Senior Member
JD Smith writes:
>
> I did once use PSConfig, but lately I've noticed it has gone the dark
> side of object graphics. For people who (still) have 8-bit displays,
> this can be an annoyance, when the color frenzy begins, and you've only
> just tried to print. Is there a replacement up to date version still
> using direct graphics?

Yes, for people still on the dark side, it is
a problem. There is no practical way to combine
direct graphics and object graphics in the same
program on an 8-bit display. The two graphics
systems just use colors in completely different
ways, which (by definition) will cause havoc
with the one physical color table.

Cheers,

David

--
David Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438 E-Mail: davidf@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: extrapolation of surface
Next Topic: Color Problems in IDL for Linux (Gnome)

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:56:26 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00411 seconds