comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » User selectable lower array bound?

Home » Public Forums » archive » User selectable lower array bound?

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: User selectable lower array bound? [message #26156 is a reply to message #25981]

Tue, 07 August 2001 10:21

Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869
Registered: November 1996

Senior Member

JD Smith <jdsmith@astro.cornell.edu> writes:
> The most annoying thing about IDL arrays to me is the need always to
> test whether they exist or not when concatenating onto them. The idea
> of extending arrays in both directions would be neatly summed up by
> allowing:
>
> a=[b,a] & a=[a,b] even if a doesn't (yet) exist.
>
> Either that, or IDL needs a list type which allows such operations.
> Wasn't that just me ranting about special case functionality leading to
> inconsistency?

Hmmm, agreed. I think WMC's and my proposal was for a "null" data
type which was essentially an empty list.

Craig

--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Thu, 02 August 2001 14:47
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Jeff Guerber on Fri, 03 August 2001 16:11
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: John-David T. Smith on Fri, 03 August 2001 15:36
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Craig Markwardt on Fri, 03 August 2001 15:08
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Mon, 06 August 2001 09:21
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: thompson on Mon, 06 August 2001 07:29
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Fri, 03 August 2001 09:49
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Stein Vidar Hagfors H[1] on Fri, 03 August 2001 09:25
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Marcus O'Brien on Fri, 03 August 2001 03:40
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: John-David T. Smith on Wed, 08 August 2001 12:26
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Wed, 08 August 2001 08:04
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Martin Schultz on Wed, 08 August 2001 04:47
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Martin Schultz on Wed, 08 August 2001 04:46
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: marc schellens[1] on Wed, 08 August 2001 07:29
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: marc schellens[1] on Tue, 07 August 2001 04:36
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Craig Markwardt on Tue, 07 August 2001 10:21
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: John-David T. Smith on Tue, 07 August 2001 08:24
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: bennetsc on Mon, 06 August 2001 20:26
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: John-David T. Smith on Mon, 06 August 2001 13:52
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Mon, 06 August 2001 09:47
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Mon, 06 August 2001 09:06
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Thu, 09 August 2001 07:04
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: david[2] on Thu, 09 August 2001 06:51
		Re: User selectable lower array bound? By: Paul van Delst on Thu, 09 August 2001 06:15

Previous Topic:	IDL virtual reality (was 3D Object IDL )
Next Topic:	problem getting values from cw_bgroup normal base

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:40:26 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00487 seconds