comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » User selectable lower array bound?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: User selectable lower array bound? [message #26174 is a reply to message #26093] Mon, 06 August 2001 07:29 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
thompson is currently offline  thompson
Messages: 584
Registered: August 1991
Senior Member
Craig Markwardt <craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu> writes:



> Paul van Delst <paul.vandelst@noaa.gov> writes:

>> Hey there,
>>
>> Is is just me, or would anyone else find useful the ability to define arrays in IDL such
>> that the lower bound is *not* always zero? Sorta like:
>>
>> x = FINDGEN( 11, LOWER = -5 )
>> or
>> y = DBLARR( 100, LOWER = 1 )
>>
>> so that accessing elements such as x[ -4 ] or y[ 100 ] are o.k.?

> Well, as grumpy as I have been in the past about IDL wishes, this is
> one thing I do not want to have in IDL now!


I'm glad I'm not the only one! When I first saw this proposal, I thought to
myself that I could hear the tinkly sound of code breaking all over the place.
:^)


William Thompson
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: IDL virtual reality (was 3D Object IDL )
Next Topic: problem getting values from cw_bgroup normal base

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:41:13 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00476 seconds