comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » _ref

Home » Public Forums » archive » _ref_extra

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: _ref_extra [message #26236 is a reply to message #23132]

Mon, 13 August 2001 10:37

Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000

Senior Member

JD Smith wrote:
>
> This does not mean, however, that allowing
> such carte blanche access is always good idea. Typically, a *small*
> subset of a class' data fields are useful and stable for public
> consumption.

All I have so far utilizes no public access to S_P and G_P at all - user
code only deals with interface, or "object I/O", methods. And if a user
is curious enough and willing to get to the very source code, he can
change anything anyway and get to object fields. And if that happens,
unified S_P and G_P will still work.
For me, the universal methods are mainly for writing other interface and
processing methods, and not for direct public use. But even in that
case, you only have to document those keywords you want :-)

Cheers,
Pavel

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		_ref_extra By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Wed, 10 January 2001 14:54
		Re: _ref_extra By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Mon, 13 August 2001 10:37
		Re: _ref_extra By: John-David T. Smith on Mon, 13 August 2001 09:47
		Re: _ref_extra By: Martin Schultz on Wed, 22 August 2001 23:58
		Re: _ref_extra By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Mon, 13 August 2001 09:19
		Re: _ref_extra By: John-David T. Smith on Fri, 10 August 2001 13:07
		Re: _ref_extra By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 10 August 2001 12:44
		Re: _ref_extra By: david[2] on Fri, 10 August 2001 12:39
		Re: _ref_extra By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Fri, 10 August 2001 11:31

Previous Topic:	Re: processing widget events from multiple hierarchies
Next Topic:	Re: polyfill errors?

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:02:55 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00366 seconds