comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: problems with VELOVECT

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: problems with VELOVECT

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: problems with VELOVECT [message #26358]

Tue, 21 August 2001 09:34

James Kuyper
Messages: 425
Registered: March 2000

Senior Member

Lasse Clausen wrote:
...
> if n_elements(missing) le 0 then missing = 1.0e30
>
> isn't IDL type-sensitive?

No.

> if n_elements(missing) gt 0 then begin
> good = where(mag lt missing)
> if keyword_set(dots) then bad = where(mag ge missing, nbad)
> endif else begin
> good = lindgen(n_elements(mag))
> endelse
>
> Strange! this if-block is totally unessesary, i believe how can
> 'missing' not be greater than 0? if it's not set (or set to a negative

It is 'n_elements(missing)' that is being compared with 0, not 'missing'
itself.

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: problems with VELOVECT By: James Kuyper on Tue, 21 August 2001 09:34
		Re: problems with VELOVECT By: Lasse Clausen on Tue, 21 August 2001 09:02
		Re: problems with VELOVECT By: Lasse Clausen on Tue, 21 August 2001 08:31
		Re: problems with VELOVECT By: btt on Tue, 21 August 2001 08:26
		Re: problems with VELOVECT By: Lasse Clausen on Tue, 21 August 2001 08:04

Previous Topic:	STRMID question
Next Topic:	Local max filter

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Mon Dec 01 15:20:00 PST 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.95688 seconds