comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: How far is OO implemented in IDL? [message #26567 is a reply to message #26481] Fri, 07 September 2001 04:08 Go to previous message
Randall Skelton is currently offline  Randall Skelton
Messages: 169
Registered: October 2000
Senior Member
On 6 Sep 2001, Mirko Vukovic wrote:

[big snip]
> Should RSI follow the GNU GCC model, and let the core language go to
> the community, and meanwhile develop and collect royalty on all the
> add-ons (all the procedures and functions, graphics, etc.)? I am not
> certain this would work too well. How many programmers out there
> would spend time upgrading the language?

Well... I for one think it would be great to have the ability to extend
the IDL language. Slow progress is being made on IBM's data explorer (now
OpenDX) which was released by IBM to the community. I will simply be
happy when the interface for pointer/heap variable is released so I can
properly build IDL objects in C and fully encapsulate the internal
structure of my data!

On the subject of software models, lets all hope we don't see IDL `XP` and
idl.net anytime soon ;)

Cheers,
Randall
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: cmyk colorcoded postscript file
Next Topic: Is there any "Dataminer" out there?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 18:40:36 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00408 seconds