| Is ANA dead? [message #27181] |
Fri, 12 October 2001 09:38  |
Aaron Birenboim
Messages: 24
Registered: October 2000
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Is ANA dead? (It is/was a free alternative to IDL)
The Lockheed WWW sites seem to have dropped it.
If it is dead, is there another IDL/MatLab/PV-Wave like
free alternative that seems to have widespread support?
(I want high-liklihood that the package will be around
in a few years)
--
Aaron Birenboim | Black holes are where G-d divided
Albuquerque, NM | by zero.
aaron@boim.com |
boim.com/~aaron | -Steven Wright
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Re: Is ANA dead? [message #27354 is a reply to message #27250] |
Thu, 18 October 2001 02:17  |
hcp
Messages: 41
Registered: August 1995
|
Member |
|
|
Given the existence of this thread and the parallel one
"Any cross-platform IDL alternatives?" I'm going to boringly re-direct
everyone to the list I keep of free alternatives to IDL that I keep [1] at
http://www.met.ed.ac.uk/~hcp/idletc.html
It doesn't mention anyting that hasn't already been hashed over already,
but I can confirm the general feeling that R and Yorick are the most
useful alternatives. Of course, neither is anything like a direct
replacement. As I see it, the pros and cons are as follows -- I also list
some "features" which are neither clear pros nor cons, but should be
taken into consideration.
R
===
Pros
-----
* Actively cross-patform
* Developing fast
* large group of developers
* good system for add-on packages and linking C/Fortran code
* Huge number of plotting and statistics features
* HDF5 support (http://www.met.ed.ac.uk/~hcp/hdf5_1.4.7.tar.gz)
Cons
----
* Slow to execute (compared to IDL and Yorick)
* No geographical maps
* Image processing and display limited.
* NetCDF support poor (only works with very old files)
Features
--------
* GPL license
* Linguistically unique, with an odour of lisp.
Yorick
=======
Pros
----
* fast execution (almost as good as IDL)
* zoomable plots
* NetCDF support
* A one-man effort: clear and simple design philosophy.
Cons
----
* A one-man effort: development is slow.
* No HDF5 support
* Mostly for Unix (I think there are Mac/Doze ports but I don't know
how actively they are used)
Features
--------
* rather old-fashioned (static) C/Fortran linking. It works OK, though.
* Lingustically like C with array operations -- the latter are more flexible
and well-thought-out than in IDL.
* BSD-like license
Anyway, I hope this is of help to someone! I'm using R at the moment, mainly for
the HDF5 support. (Hello, RSI! HDF5! Sometime before 2004 would be good :-) )
All the best
Hugh
[1] "Maintain" is too strong a word.
--
============================================================ ==============
Hugh C. Pumphrey | Telephone 0131-650-6026
Department of Meteorology | FAX 0131-650-5780
The University of Edinburgh | Replace 0131 with +44-131 if outside U.K.
EDINBURGH EH9 3JZ, Scotland | Email hcp@met.ed.ac.uk
OBDisclaimer: The views expressed herein are mine, not those of UofE.
============================================================ ==============
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
