comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » IDL Pricing
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
IDL Pricing [message #27480] Thu, 25 October 2001 01:46 Go to next message
Please_Spam is currently offline  Please_Spam
Messages: 2
Registered: October 2001
Junior Member
Dear NG,

I am using IDL/Wave since 1993 for vizualisation purposes in the field
of space imaging and atmospheric science.

Since then the pricing (including schools and universities) increased
drastically. We are spending now more then 10.000 Euro for about 20
licenses (the reseller told us that this is not the normal price but a
special bargain- what a joke).

I am seriously thinking about leaving the IDL/Wave track and go for
something cheaper or free software. Of course I would like to move to
something that has some affinity to IDL but this does not necessarily
must be the case (a colleague told me that something like scilab, a
free matlab derivative might be helpful). On the other hand I read
about gdl (a free IDL developed at sourcefourge), which is announced
to be compatibel to IDL, but on sourcefourge they don't seem to make
progress since 2000- This sounds not too promising...

At least one thing is clear to me and my colleagues, we don't want to
support such (monopolist) pricing policy by still buying IDL, PV-Wave
and related products as long as we can avoid it. And much more
important: we cannot afford it any more!

I would like to ask the NG what is your opinion about the pricing?
Have you made the same experience? And, if so, what are your proposals
to prevent from being trapped in this way? Or do we only have the
wrong reseller ;-)
Are there any free IDL derivative?

Best wishes

Marco
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27558 is a reply to message #27480] Fri, 26 October 2001 11:06 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Liam E. Gumley is currently offline  Liam E. Gumley
Messages: 378
Registered: January 2000
Senior Member
Guillaume Dargaud wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Anyway, the other thing I don't like in IDL are graphics. Try to do a
> surface plots in less than... 40 lines. In most graphic packages it takes
> one line !

Here's an example from "Practical IDL Programming" (p. 271). For
demonstration purposes, let's create a 2D sinc function defined over the
range -10 to 10 in x and y:

v = findgen(41) * 0.5 - 10.0
x = rebin(v, 41, 41, /sample)
y = rebin(reform(v, 1, 41), 41, 41, /sample)
r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2) + 1.0e-6
z = sin(r) / r

To plot the data as a mesh surface:

surface, z, x, y

To plot the data as a shaded surface:

shade_surf, z, x, y

Therefore IDL is perfectly capable of plotting a surface in one line.

Cheers,
Liam.
Practical IDL Programming
http://www.gumley.com/
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27563 is a reply to message #27480] Fri, 26 October 2001 09:15 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Guillaume Dargaud (dargaud@sung3.ifsi.rm.cnr.it) writes:

> Try to do a surface plots in less than... 40 lines.

That must be one hell of a surface. I'd like to
see that. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27564 is a reply to message #27480] Fri, 26 October 2001 09:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Guillaume Dargaud is currently offline  Guillaume Dargaud
Messages: 15
Registered: January 2001
Junior Member
> Free IDL ?

I'm kind of in the same situation. But not really for money. I know this is
the wrong newsgroup to say it (you guys have been nice enough to help me
many times), but I've never liked IDL very much. I've been using it on and
off for... 13 years... and I still can't make sense of it.
I mean I can program in two dozen languages, but when I need to do something
in IDL I never know where to start, probably because there are so many ways
to do one thing. I end up frustrated when I compare my code with a colleague
and his is 10+ times faster. At least in C there's no such problem: you code
the damn loop and it will be compiled in tightly optimized code. In IDL if
you don't find the proper one line construct to do the thing it will be
hellishly slow. And more often than not I can't find it. Blame me.
Anyway, the other thing I don't like in IDL are graphics. Try to do a
surface plots in less than... 40 lines. In most graphic packages it takes
one line !
So I end up coding my math stuff in C because I know exactly how to optimize
it. And I keep bitching about the graphic complications in IDL.

Here's what I would like:
a graphic library that can be used two ways: directly from a command line
system (so you can test); or as a C library where you call the functions
fast.

I've used many in the past that fit one or the other (like the dead GraphiC
or Mathematica which you can call from C), and right now I was looking into
'R' and gnuplot but don't know anything about those.

Thanks for your time and sorry I'm not contributing anything positive.
--
Guillaume Dargaud
Colorado State University - Dept of Atmospheric Science
http://rome.atmos.colostate.edu/
"The generation of random numbers is too important to be left to
nce." - Robert R. Coveyou, Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27574 is a reply to message #27480] Fri, 26 October 2001 03:24 Go to previous messageGo to next message
the_cacc is currently offline  the_cacc
Messages: 104
Registered: October 2001
Senior Member
Aside from slating me, what suggestions do you have ?
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27605 is a reply to message #27480] Thu, 25 October 2001 10:01 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Pavel A. Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
Ciao wrote:

> Price-wise - what's the cost of several weeks per year extra
> programming effort ?

Oh, for "several weeks of programming" investing anything into anything
is a waste of effort. Just ask a classmate to solve it for you.

Ciao.
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27606 is a reply to message #27480] Thu, 25 October 2001 09:52 Go to previous messageGo to next message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
trouble (the_cacc@hotmail.com) writes:

> Price-wise - what's the cost of several weeks per year extra
> programming effort ?

In terms of increased knowledge and skills? Priceless.

Oh, wait. Weren't you the "lazy programmer". Forget it. :-)

Ciao
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27609 is a reply to message #27480] Thu, 25 October 2001 09:39 Go to previous messageGo to next message
the_cacc is currently offline  the_cacc
Messages: 104
Registered: October 2001
Senior Member
You know what I think ? If you have not already invested in IDL (ie.
written a lot of IDL code), go straight to MATLAB. After numerous
searches on the web for stuff, there seems to be buckets-worth of C,
FORTRAN and MATLAB but not much IDL - what there is is of course
great, but in terms of quantity it doesn't compete.

This is important when you're looking to use the latest numerical
gizmos to see how they work - in MATLAB, 99% chance it's been done
elsewhere, if not by MATHWORKS themselves.

Price-wise - what's the cost of several weeks per year extra
programming effort ?

Ciao.
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27664 is a reply to message #27574] Mon, 29 October 2001 13:21 Go to previous messageGo to next message
Pavel A. Romashkin is currently offline  Pavel A. Romashkin
Messages: 531
Registered: November 2000
Senior Member
How about letting us know your name to start with?

trouble wrote:
>
> Aside from slating me, what suggestions do you have ?
Re: IDL Pricing [message #27717 is a reply to message #27558] Fri, 02 November 2001 02:00 Go to previous message
Heike Koch-Beuttenmue is currently offline  Heike Koch-Beuttenmue
Messages: 6
Registered: October 1999
Junior Member
"Liam E. Gumley" wrote:
>
> Guillaume Dargaud wrote:
> [stuff deleted]
>> Anyway, the other thing I don't like in IDL are graphics. Try to do a
>> surface plots in less than... 40 lines. In most graphic packages it takes
>> one line !
>
> Here's an example from "Practical IDL Programming" (p. 271). For
> demonstration purposes, let's create a 2D sinc function defined over the
> range -10 to 10 in x and y:
>
> v = findgen(41) * 0.5 - 10.0
> x = rebin(v, 41, 41, /sample)
> y = rebin(reform(v, 1, 41), 41, 41, /sample)
> r = sqrt(x^2 + y^2) + 1.0e-6
> z = sin(r) / r
>
> To plot the data as a mesh surface:
>
> surface, z, x, y
>
> To plot the data as a shaded surface:
>
> shade_surf, z, x, y
>
> Therefore IDL is perfectly capable of plotting a surface in one line.
>
> Cheers,
> Liam.
> Practical IDL Programming
> http://www.gumley.com/

I think , Software like Maple,..., is doing it much easier, for example:

plot3d(sin((x^2+y^2))/(x^2+y^2)),x=-10..10,y=-10..10);


But I would like to know something else:
Can anybody tel me , where I can find comparisons between PV-WAVE and
IDL especially the newest versions and may-be between those ane Matlab?
I think all three are very expansive.

Mit freundlichen Gr��en

Heike Koch-Beuttenm�ller

=======================================================
Dr. Heike Koch-Beuttenm�ller
Universit�t Ulm
Universit�tsrechenzentrum
Albert-Einstein-Allee 11
D-89081 Ulm
Germany
e-mail: Heike.Koch-Beuttenmueller@rz.uni-ulm.de
Telefon: 0731 5022465
=======================================================
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: Convol with Kernel Dependency Of the Radius to the Middle
Next Topic: LINK : warning LNK4068: /MACHINE not specified; defaulting to IX86

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 14:53:40 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00687 seconds