comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive: archive » Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure

Home » Public Forums » archive » Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure

Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend

Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure [message #27728 is a reply to message #27726]

Thu, 01 November 2001 14:58

David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001

Senior Member

Pavel A. Romashkin (pavel.romashkin@noaa.gov) writes:

> I am getting confused by David and JD. Isn't all you want is this:

I'm going to have a class on How to Write Questions
that Normal People Can Answer. I should know better
than to guess what someone *really* means. :-)

But questions, many times, are symptoms of confusion,
not actual entities that should be answered specifically.
Any good technical support person knows that, but fewer
have time to do it right.

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155

Report message to a moderator

[Message index]

		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: Logan Lindquist on Fri, 02 November 2001 12:06
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: Craig Markwardt on Thu, 01 November 2001 15:36
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: David Fanning on Thu, 01 November 2001 14:58
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: Pavel A. Romashkin on Thu, 01 November 2001 14:27
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: David Fanning on Thu, 01 November 2001 14:05
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: John-David T. Smith on Thu, 01 November 2001 13:24
		Re: Defining Integer Field in a Structure By: Harvey Rarback on Tue, 06 November 2001 17:02

Previous Topic:	Re: FSFC/IDL5.5 installation
Next Topic:	RSI, Mac and Tru64

-=] Back to Top [=-

[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [

] [

]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 10:43:36 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.36026 seconds