comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » Sacrilegious but genuine question
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Return to the default flat view Create a new topic Submit Reply
Re: Sacrilegious but genuine question [message #28786 is a reply to message #28762] Fri, 11 January 2002 08:26 Go to previous messageGo to previous message
David Fanning is currently offline  David Fanning
Messages: 11724
Registered: August 2001
Senior Member
Francis Burton (F.Burton@biomed.gla.ac.uk) writes:

> Seriously, I'm interested to know why you think it's no good.
> Did RSI drop it for the same reason?

The official word is that IDL dropped Insight because
it could not be made compatible with the Y2K problem.
I, personally, take everything RSI says at face value,
so I believe them. :-)

Insight lives on, though, in the form of Live Tools.
But I'm afraid these don't meet your requirements for
extensibility either, as RSI does not make the source
code for these tools available. (Presumably they are
too difficult to modify, even to solve time/date
problems.) My biggest problem with these tools is
that they do 90% of what I want (possibly), but it
is that other 10% that I desperately need.

As you are discovering, this is probably true of
most, if not all, applications. That is why a programming
language is preferable to an application for most
scientists. When you can combine a program (e.g., ENVI)
with a programming language, you may have the best of
all possible worlds. And there is a LOT of IDL code
out there. For example, I think my MPI_PLOT program
would probably be quite easy to modify for your
purposes. You would have a very nice, interactive
program that displays data exactly the way you want
it to, and you could extend it easily.

>> I meant an IDL program that allowed you to display
>> data the way you want to, without everything "quickly
>> becoming a mess".
>
> Oh, alright. I think I should have a go at that myself -
> make it my first IDL project.

It would be a perfect first project, I think.

> "But IDL is a language, not an application."

Yes, but a high-level language that *builds* applications.
That is the key, I think.

> Patience David - I'm learning! :-P

Me, too. :-)

Cheers,

David

--
David W. Fanning, Ph.D.
Fanning Software Consulting
Phone: 970-221-0438, E-mail: david@dfanning.com
Coyote's Guide to IDL Programming: http://www.dfanning.com/
Toll-Free IDL Book Orders: 1-888-461-0155
[Message index]
 
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Read Message
Previous Topic: RGB image to 8 bit ??
Next Topic: Working with 2 partially overlapping images of different array sizes

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Sun Oct 12 14:51:18 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 1.51986 seconds