comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Messages from Usenet group comp.lang.idl-pvwave, compiled by Paulo Penteado

Home » Public Forums » archive » XSTRETCH in P.Multi - is it efficient?
Show: Today's Messages :: Show Polls :: Message Navigator
E-mail to friend 
Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
XSTRETCH in P.Multi - is it efficient? [message #30140] Fri, 05 April 2002 20:25
K.Y.Choi is currently offline  K.Y.Choi
Messages: 4
Registered: April 2002
Junior Member
Now, I am trying to make widget program that contains two plot with a
image. I also would like to include mouse-oriented indication bar in
both plot area, which synchronise with the position of the image. I
guess it would be based on something like XSTRETCH.pro from D.Fanning.

Question are, if I put those plots and image in a simgle Widget_Draw,
would it become much slower while interactive moving lines on plots
are moving? I wonder this is one of reason why XSTRETCH.pro has two
windows, i.e. two TLB.

In fact, since I tend to include loop that scans through the data
range, approximately 5000 steps within 1 or 2 minutes, speed really
matters to me. XSTRETCH continuously uses PIXMAP while moving lines
with mouse, and I guess such processing is possibly slower in, for
instance, 800-by-800 Widget_Draw.

Alternatively, I thought three different Widget_Draws in a single TLB.
Problem again comes when resize windows. Also, I am not sure how much
difference in processing speed with comparison to the pervious method,
and which method would be less complicate and more economical in
programming-wise.

If anybody faced such problem, I should be appreciate.

Reno


P.S. Thank you for your quick comment on SELECTIMAGE, Dave. Yes. It
looks great.
  Switch to threaded view of this topic Create a new topic Submit Reply
Previous Topic: 3D Surface Problem
Next Topic: Re: XSTRETCH in P.Multi - is it efficient?

-=] Back to Top [=-
[ Syndicate this forum (XML) ] [ RSS ] [ PDF ]

Current Time: Wed Oct 08 19:58:30 PDT 2025

Total time taken to generate the page: 0.00552 seconds