| Re: Seg. Fault in IDL 5.5 (Linux) [message #30865] |
Sat, 18 May 2002 07:42 |
Sebastian Moeller
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2002
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Sebastian Moeller wrote:
> Randall Skelton wrote:
>
>> Using IDL 5.5 (Linux) I get a seg. fault when I do:
>>
>> print, uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
>>
> With IDL Version 5.5 Win32 (x86) under windows 2000 professional (german
> language versuion, SP2) this command "crashes" IDL. (Even the assignment
> b = unig([1,2,3,4,5,6]�, 1) makes this version of IDL go boink. But I
> only tested this after testing your offensive command without a clean
> restart, so there might be something unsane left from the first crash)
>
> Sebastian Moeller
>
OK sorry for exessive posting. But if I do
uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
I just get an error
IDL> uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
^
% Syntax error.
if do now
IDL> b = uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
% Compiled module: UNIQ.
the assignment works without crashing IDL (as it does if issued as the
first command in a fresh IDL session).
But just look at this
IDL> print, uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
0
the original offensive command works.
|
|
|
|
| Re: Seg. Fault in IDL 5.5 (Linux) [message #30867 is a reply to message #30865] |
Sat, 18 May 2002 07:28  |
Sebastian Moeller
Messages: 7
Registered: April 2002
|
Junior Member |
|
|
Randall Skelton wrote:
> Using IDL 5.5 (Linux) I get a seg. fault when I do:
>
> print, uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
>
With IDL Version 5.5 Win32 (x86) under windows 2000 professional (german
language versuion, SP2) this command "crashes" IDL. (Even the assignment
b = unig([1,2,3,4,5,6]�, 1) makes this version of IDL go boink. But I
only tested this after testing your offensive command without a clean
restart, so there might be something unsane left from the first crash)
Sebastian Moeller
|
|
|
|
| Re: Seg. Fault in IDL 5.5 (Linux) [message #30868 is a reply to message #30867] |
Sat, 18 May 2002 06:29 |
weitkamp
Messages: 33
Registered: October 1998
|
Member |
|
|
Randall Skelton <rhskelto@atm.ox.ac.uk> wrote in message news:<Pine.LNX.4.33.0205181137120.22341-100000@mulligan.atm.ox.ac.uk>...
> Using IDL 5.5 (Linux) I get a seg. fault when I do:
>
> print, uniq([1,2,3,4,5,6], 1)
>
> I realize the statement is incorrect, but this ought to be trapped by IDL.
> Before I go complaining to RSI, does anyone else observe this behavior or
> is it just going to be one of those days...
I get the same behavior, both on Linux and Solaris, more precisely:
{ x86 linux unix linux 5.5a Feb 7 2002 32 32}
{ sparc sunos unix Solaris 5.5 Aug 28 2001 64 64}
Timm
Timm Weitkamp
European Synchrotron Radiation Facility (ESRF), Grenoble, France
|
|
|
|
comp.lang.idl-pvwave archive
Members
Search
Help
Login
Home
