Re: Executable [message #31452] |
Thu, 11 July 2002 12:01 |
Craig Markwardt
Messages: 1869 Registered: November 1996
|
Senior Member |
|
|
Randall Skelton <rhskelto@atm.ox.ac.uk> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Neil Talsania <neil.talsania@kodak.com> wrote:
> ^^^^^^^^^
>
> Surely this is not for real. I would have thought that a _Kodak_ employee
> could have directly called the to the RSI CEO for support =)
>
>> I am giving a demo of an IDL application to a customer next week. I would
>> like to package up my IDL code into something that I can launch from either
>> the start menu or an icon. This is still going to be running on my machine,
>> so licenses are not an issue. Also, I would like it if the IDL development
>> window was not present (as an icon would be OK). I think that this would
>> make for a nicer demo, then having to bring up IDL to start then run my
>> code.
>
> Kidding aside, see: http://www.dfanning.com/tips/idl_icon.html
>
>> One other complication is that in order for my code to work I need to
>> restore envi in batch mode so that I have access to some of their functions.
>
> Sorry, you are on your own with envi...
Heh, and the irony is that Kodak is the company that was menacingly
threatening legal action against me for my SAVE library, for the very
reason that they were worried about the security of ENVI code from
prying eyes.
Craig
--
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
Craig B. Markwardt, Ph.D. EMAIL: craigmnet@cow.physics.wisc.edu
Astrophysics, IDL, Finance, Derivatives | Remove "net" for better response
------------------------------------------------------------ --------------
|
|
|
Re: Executable [message #31465 is a reply to message #31452] |
Wed, 10 July 2002 21:16  |
alt
Messages: 28 Registered: August 2001
|
Junior Member |
|
|
"Neil Talsania" <neil.talsania@kodak.com> wrote in message news:<agi6k5$4j8$1@news.kodak.com>...
> Hi, ...
Making RunTime version of the program is a good way of making IDL
"executable". And it is suitable for classic developer-customer
relations, when developer gives the finished program to the customer.
But it is not very convenient if your application (used by your
colleagues nearby) is being developed, fixed, changed ... continually.
RunTime version does not allow debug your program at user workplace
and "forget" some very useful additional information such as program
line numbers at catch output (help, /last). So in this case I prefer
using "startup file" option of IDLDE preferences. If startup program
find some file (e.g. AutoRun.pro) at startup working directory startup
program call it. Unfortunately IDLDE seems to ignore Windows option of
start as an icon, so to hide(icon) IDLDE some special tools must be
used (e.g. DoHide).
Best regards,
Altyntsev Dmitriy
Remote Sensing Center, ISTP
Irkutsk, Russia
http://ckm.iszf.irk.ru
|
|
|
Re: Executable [message #31467 is a reply to message #31465] |
Wed, 10 July 2002 15:29  |
Randall Skelton
Messages: 169 Registered: October 2000
|
Senior Member |
|
|
On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Neil Talsania <neil.talsania@kodak.com> wrote:
^^^^^^^^^
Surely this is not for real. I would have thought that a _Kodak_ employee
could have directly called the to the RSI CEO for support =)
> I am giving a demo of an IDL application to a customer next week. I would
> like to package up my IDL code into something that I can launch from either
> the start menu or an icon. This is still going to be running on my machine,
> so licenses are not an issue. Also, I would like it if the IDL development
> window was not present (as an icon would be OK). I think that this would
> make for a nicer demo, then having to bring up IDL to start then run my
> code.
Kidding aside, see: http://www.dfanning.com/tips/idl_icon.html
> One other complication is that in order for my code to work I need to
> restore envi in batch mode so that I have access to some of their functions.
Sorry, you are on your own with envi...
Cheers,
Randall
|
|
|